From: DanC <danc@compuall.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] M measured by the S&P 500 index
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 23:47:39 -0700
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Evaluator Updates DanC
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Evaluator Updates David Thompson
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] M measured by the S&P 500 index "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Somehow, I believe, investor psychology has to be a component, vix, vin. cot, my extreme bearish bias, ?. Ursusly, Dan "Hill, Ernie" wrote: > Someone has ask me off list if I have tried going back over my analysis that > failed, and look for the weight of evidence to point in the opposite > direction? > My answer was yes I have, and I stand by my original analysis as being the > highest probable outcome. The problem is that investor psychology is at an > extreme right now, which like unexpected news can skew the probabilities in > ways that are very difficult to account for. > Hopefully investor psychology will soon return to a more "normal" state, and > my methodology will become a little more accurate. > E > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hill, Ernie > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:05 PM > To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] M measured by the S&P 500 index > > Awfully quite on the list tonight. > > Well it looks like the S&P did more than just undercut last weeks low by > just a little bit! > > M has now trashed the projections that I made on Friday. Two false turn > signals and the low still may not be in. If it were not for the > encouragement of some of you on this list I would refuse to humiliate myself > further. > > M will do as M wants. Regardless of what I see the probabilities to be. None > the less I will stick my neck out there again and say that if today was not > the low of the move then it is highly likely that it will occur within the > next four trading days. As for the target price I dare not venture a guess > (only because I don't have any high probability targets). > > What M does reveal to me by it's actions is that there is tremendous > weakness and the rally that I have been anticipating could be much shorter > and weaker than I had been expecting. > > I will keep you posted. > > E > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hill, Ernie > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 10:29 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: [CANSLIM] M measured by the S&P 500 index > > Early next week we may challenge the low made on 4-30 and possibly even > undercut it slightly before moving up. The time window for the next > significant high turning point is from 5-16 to 5-28. There are several valid > price targets and high probability dates for those targets. I will give you > these dates and price targets that I see in my analysis. As the market > approaches these dates and targets we can determine the actual turning point > by how the market reacts to these possibilities. > > The highest probability that I see is a target price of 1121 occurring on > 5-16. Here are the rest of my targets in order of highest probability. > > 5-17 1137 > 5-22 1124 > 5-16 1104 > 5-22 In the range of 1140 to 1155 > And the smallest probability 5-28 at 1216. > > I realize there are several targets and dates listed here but as the market > gets closer to the actual turning point I will be able to narrow down the > possibilities. The important thing is that a market turn should be expected > very near one of these dates and price levels. I could get cute like last > time and try to pick one specific target, and probably be humbled again. > > You may be asking so what is the application to CANSLIM? Simply this, for > most CANSLIM investors the coming price bounce in the market will very > likely be too short and not strong enough for you to attempt to make a buy. > However, for the nimble this short and likely weak bounce could give us some > nice profits in some of the fast growing small caps where we have found some > success lately. > > GOOD LUCK, > E > > ****************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso > Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please notify the > sender. > ****************************************************************** > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > ****************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso > Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please notify the > sender. > ****************************************************************** > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > ****************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso > Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please notify the > sender. > ****************************************************************** > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Evaluator Updates DanC
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Evaluator Updates David Thompson
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] M measured by the S&P 500 index "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]