RE: TOO (was:[CANSLIM] WebLinks)

From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: RE: TOO (was:[CANSLIM] WebLinks)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:33:29 -0600

Next Article (by Date): Re: TOO (was:[CANSLIM] WebLinks) "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Off-topic: IRA question "Edward W. Gjertsen II"
Top of Thread: RE: TOO (was:[CANSLIM] WebLinks) "Duke Miller"
Next in Thread: Re: TOO (was:[CANSLIM] WebLinks) "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

It is a little hard sometimes, and as has been mentioned, most people practice 
some modified form of CANSLIM.  I've tried to see what the underlying idea is to 
the whole thing, and I think it gets down to a few things that make sense to me -

- -You want to time your buy so you get in when a stock is making a move, and you 
have a reasonable risk point if you are wrong.
- -You are looking for strong growth companies.
- -You are looking for something new, something that is a catalyst for strong and 
hopefully sustained growth in a company, like a new product, a new industry (see 
the internet, or the networking market of the early nineties as new industries).

All the other stuff is somewhat peripheral, I think, guess there is room for argument 
there, but basically you want growth (a company executing well) and a company in 
a growing industry (the old expanding pie idea).  I guess I like the letters CANLM the 
best.

On 16 May 2002 at 11:09, Duke Miller wrote:

> Thanks Patrick and Tom.
> 
> I'm narrowing my MUST criteria more as time goes on.  Got any darts you
> want to sell me!?!?
> 

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.