From: "The Lensing's" <alensing@prodigy.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Help Needed
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 20:45:07 -0500
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Homebuilders and stuff "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] Help Needed "Mike Gibbons"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Help Needed Chazmoore@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Help Needed Chazmoore@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C1FD1A.902363E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Charley: I, like you, am often confused by the conflicting data that I view from = Yahoo, Aol, DGO, Multex, etc. I am not sure which data are reliable. = For example, I was recently researching Lockheed Martin, and the PE from = DGO was approx 40 and from Yahoo, it was over 100. How can one make a = reasonable study of a stock based on such variable info? I would = welcome any and all comments. Alicia ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Chazmoore@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:27 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Help Needed Mike: Thanks for responding and for fixing the leak.=20 The fact that the Evaluator uses information from Yahoo Market Guide = and I (and many others I suspect) use Daily Graphs creates a problem for = me. DGO updates daily and the particular Market Guide report for Expedia = was updated May 11th. There really shouldn't be much difference but here = are a few of the inconsistencies that I found:=20 P/E Ratio TTM: DGO 64; Yahoo NM=20 EPS TTM: DGO $1.26; Yahoo -0.01=20 Cash Flow TTM: DGO $2.12; Yahoo $1.06=20 Return on Equity TTM: DGO 24%; Yahoo .73%=20 If I am reading this correctly, based only on these inconsistencies, = EXPE looks very good when evaluated by DGO and very poor when evaluated = by Yahoo.=20 Anyone out there care to help me clear the fog? I still don't know = what I am doing wrong. Charley=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C1FD1A.902363E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DSystem color=3D#0000ff=20 size=3D2>Charley:</FONT></STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DSystem color=3D#0000ff = size=3D2></FONT></STRONG> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DSystem color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>I, like you, = am often=20 confused by the conflicting data that I view from Yahoo, Aol, DGO, = Multex,=20 etc. I am not sure which data are reliable. For example, I = was=20 recently researching Lockheed Martin, and the PE from DGO was approx 40 = and from=20 Yahoo, it was over 100. How can one make a reasonable study of a = stock=20 based on such variable info? I would welcome any and all=20 comments.</FONT></STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DSystem color=3D#0000ff = size=3D2></FONT></STRONG> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DSystem color=3D#0000ff = size=3D2>Alicia</FONT></STRONG></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3DChazmoore@aol.com=20 href=3D"mailto:Chazmoore@aol.com">Chazmoore@aol.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 16, 2002 = 8:27=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Help = Needed</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT size=3D2>Mike: = Thanks for=20 responding and for fixing the leak. <BR><BR>The fact that the = Evaluator uses=20 information from Yahoo Market Guide and I (and many others I suspect) = use=20 Daily Graphs creates a problem for me. DGO updates daily and the = particular=20 Market Guide report for Expedia was updated May 11th. There really = shouldn't=20 be much difference but here are a few of the inconsistencies that I = found:=20 <BR><BR>P/E Ratio TTM: DGO 64; Yahoo NM <BR><BR>EPS TTM: DGO $1.26; = Yahoo=20 -0.01 <BR><BR>Cash Flow TTM: DGO $2.12; Yahoo $1.06 <BR><BR>Return on = Equity=20 TTM: DGO 24%; Yahoo .73% <BR><BR>If I am reading this correctly, based = only on=20 these inconsistencies, EXPE looks very good when evaluated by DGO and = very=20 poor when evaluated by Yahoo. <BR><BR>Anyone out there care to help me = clear=20 the fog? I still don't know what I am doing wrong. Charley</FONT>=20 </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C1FD1A.902363E0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Homebuilders and stuff "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] Help Needed "Mike Gibbons"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Help Needed Chazmoore@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Help Needed Chazmoore@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]