Re: [CANSLIM] FNS

From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] FNS
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 23:36:14 EDT

Next Article (by Date): [none] Subject: [none]
Previous Article (by Date): FNF (was Re: [CANSLIM] Re: FNS) "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] FNS John Lessnau
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] FNS Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

John:

     Some of the fundamentals do look good (esp. ROE which is 27% according 
to DGO, and U/D 2.5).  And the weekly does seem to be making a C&H. 
     
     However, the Annual Earnings "Increases" aren't good.  They're projected 
to be 
 -13% in '02 and -15% more in '03.  I put so much stock in annual earnings 
increases that for this reason alone I would intentionally overlook it.

jans


In a message dated 5/22/2002 10:57:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
jl@lessnau.com writes:

<< I spotted FNS in the CANSLIM newsgroup and thought I would share it with 
this list.  It has great fundimentals and the weekly chart shows a nice cup 
and handle.  Only negative seems to be its slowing growth and the the lack of 
 "M" which  afflicts all potential CANSLIMs.   >>

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.