From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] FNS
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 23:36:14 EDT
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Re: FNS "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Date): [none] Subject: [none]
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] FNS John Lessnau
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
John:
Some of the fundamentals do look good (esp. ROE which is 27% according
to DGO, and U/D 2.5). And the weekly does seem to be making a C&H.
However, the Annual Earnings "Increases" aren't good. They're projected
to be
-13% in '02 and -15% more in '03. I put so much stock in annual earnings
increases that for this reason alone I would intentionally overlook it.
jans
In a message dated 5/22/2002 10:57:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
jl@lessnau.com writes:
<< I spotted FNS in the CANSLIM newsgroup and thought I would share it with
this list. It has great fundimentals and the weekly chart shows a nice cup
and handle. Only negative seems to be its slowing growth and the the lack of
"M" which afflicts all potential CANSLIMs. >>
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Re: FNS "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Date): [none] Subject: [none]
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] FNS John Lessnau
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]