Re: [CANSLIM] Law Suits (was ACRT or MXT?)


From: "Norman" <theboyd@tisd.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Law Suits (was ACRT or MXT?)
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 17:53:09 -0500

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Law Suits (was ACRT or MXT?) "Norman"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Law Suits (was ACRT or MXT?) "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Law Suits (was ACRT or MXT?) "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Katherine,

shed some light on that point for me.  I have seen many companies the
subject of law suits in the past for exactly this type of thing:  making
misleading or false statements during specific time periods, usually just
before the stock price tanks.  It seems that this happened often after March
2000.  How can one tell if a law suit is significant/legitimate or just
disgruntled stock holders?  Is it significant just because the legal papers
have been filed?  And, does that trouble extend until the legal action is
dismissed?

norm

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ACRT or MXT?


Hi James & Tom,

Not to mention things like this in the significant developments raise enough
red flags to stay away from something like ACRT:

http://yahoo.marketguide.com/MGI/news.asp?target=stocks%2Fcompanyinformation
%2Fnews&Ticker=ACRT&TEXT=CMTX:20020412:102u4338

I'm with Tom.....just get in the habit of ignoring stocks with an RS<60 and
don't be tempted to bottom fish. Go to Investors.com and read articles on
Fallen Angels and Falling Knives to get the gist.

Katherine
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Tom Worley
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
  Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 4:53 PM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ACRT or MXT?


  H James,

  RS of 30 would keep ACRT off my list
  RS of 18 would also block MCSI
  RS of 9 on NYFX, goodbye
  RS of 14 on MXT - sorry, none would go beyond a first glance for me

  all have recent, and substantial, overhead due to the recent price
declines.
  They will be fighting resistance all the way back up.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "James Wang" <jamesjw1@hotmail.com>
  To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
  Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 5:29 PM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] ACRT or MXT?




  Hi, Just to learn recognizing potential winning
  stocks, by their both fundamantals and technical
  analysis.  I recently did some research on the following
  stocks, and find they could be great candidates for
  longs.  What do you think:

  ACRT: steady earings, low PE and low PEG, high short ratio.

  MCSI: good earings, good values.

  NYFX: should be great with economy's recovery.

  MXT: great potential with recovery, over 80% short in floats.  Great
values.

  James

  _________________________________________________________________
  Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


  -
  -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
  -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
  -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.




  -
  -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
  -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
  -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Law Suits (was ACRT or MXT?) "Norman"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Law Suits (was ACRT or MXT?) "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Law Suits (was ACRT or MXT?) "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.