Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview

From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 19:48:58 -0600

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

This seems a little confusing to me, probably some odd way the feds count workers 
and so on, maybe you can clear it up - how can expectations be for more jobs 
added than actually were, with a rise in unemployment, while in fact we had a fewer 
jobs added with a decrease in the unemployment rate.  Something doesn't add up 
there.

On 8 Jun 2002 at 20:27, Tom Worley wrote:

> EMPLOYMENT
> Friday's report surprised with positive news, overall unemployment dropping
> to 5.8% from 6% instead of rising as expected to 6.1%. New jobs were well
> under expectations, with 41K added instead of 75K. Revised new jobs in April
> ended up only 6K.

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.