From: "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]" <john.cefaloni@us.army.mil>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] "M" History
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:45:45 -0400
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Subject "M" "Dan Forant"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" History "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" History "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Dave, Nothing passes the time like a good argument. And since it's a slow day on the CANSLIM message board, I don't feel too guilty about exploring this tangent. I'm afraid your argument is full of holes. Tsk, tsk, using Google as a "leading indicator" for language? I typed in the word "CHEIF" and got 37,300 hits. This is a bigger subset of our population than those that give hexadecimal digits "legitimacy". Are misspelled words becoming legitimate too? All in good fun, John C. - -----Original Message----- From: dave.bigham@us.abb.com [mailto:dave.bigham@us.abb.com] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:31 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] "M" History Recognize that as language changes, dictionariess are following indicators (investment content.) Most include new terms and definitions based in large part on current and increasing usage. A quick search of Google resulted in about 11,700 hits on the term "hexadecimal digit" - an oxymoron on its face if we are forced to abide by your dictionary's definition for "digit." Common use, in at least a subset of our population, has given the letters 'a' through 'f' some legitimacy as 'digits.' Before the flames begin, I got a good chuckle out of your reply. I am one of the first, usually in good humor, to point out others' foibles and mistakes. I (sometimes) get a laugh when others point out mine. All the best Dave Bigham |-------------> |(Embedded | |image moved | |to file: | |pic19320.pcx)| | | |-------------> >------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]" <john.cefaloni@us.army.mil> | |06/14/2002 10:53 AM | >------------------------------------------------------------------------| Please respond to canslim@lists.xmission.com To: "'canslim@lists.xmission.com'" <canslim@lists.xmission.com> cc: (bcc: Dave Bigham/USINY/ABB) Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] "M" History Security Level:? Internal Sorry, but it doesn't look like letters fit the definition of "digit"... digit \Dig"it\, n. [L. digitus finger; prob. akin to Gr. ?, of uncertain origin; possibly akin to E. toe. Cf. Dactyl.] 1. (Zo["o]l.) One of the terminal divisions of a limb appendage; a finger or toe. The ruminants have the ``cloven foot,'' i. e., two hoofed digits on each foot. --Owen. 2. A finger's breadth, commonly estimated to be three fourths of an inch. 3. (Math.) One of the ten figures or symbols, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, by which all numbers are expressed; -- so called because of the use of the fingers in counting and computing. Note: By some authorities the symbol 0 is not included with the digits. - -----Original Message----- From: dave.bigham@us.abb.com [mailto:dave.bigham@us.abb.com] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:44 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] "M" History >Kelly, > >I also wondered whether -1% through -9% could be considered "single digit". > >Cheers, In the hope of putting an inclusive end to it, for all you computer geeks, the letters 'a' through 'f' are single digits too. Right now, I wouldn't mind getting a some f% return on anything! All the best Dave Bigham - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Subject "M" "Dan Forant"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" History "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" History "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]