Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?


From: "Winston Little" <wlittle1@peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:23:46 -0400

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? Gene Ricci
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? Fanus
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? Spencer48@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Fanus:

The points you make are very true.

I also believe that a big part of t he blame for WCOM, ENE, GX, KM and other
similar are the fault of shareholders.

Not many people vote to appoint Board of Directors (BOD) or attend and
PARTICIPATE in annual meetings.

There are just a few hundred CEO (conceited, exclusive, overpaid )  whose
names recurrently appear on the BOD as you go from company to company. These
members slap each other on the back, are more interested in each others golf
handicap than corporate matters, and vote for excessive pay and greed, so
that they too will receive excessive rewards.

Look at what happened to Walter Hewlett when he challenged those clowns. Did
the share holders come to his defense? No, they went with the slimeballs.

When shareholders vote for independent and outside BOD, they have a right to
expect vigilance and honesty. When we do not and allow the BOD to be
populated by hacks in a circle, we can only expect to be jerked.


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Fanus" <fanus13@yahoo.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?


> So, you are saying throw away the fundamentals and
> trade only on the technicals?
>
> There are probably close to 10000 public traded
> companies and just because a handful of companies
> committed fraud and use creative accounting, does that
> mean the other 99% are also just as bad?   This is
> like saying because a small fraction of the population
> is in prison, this mean all people are criminals.
>
> - Fanus
>
> --- Spencer48@aol.com wrote:
> > Group:
> >
> >      I'm surprised noone has mentioned this yet:
> > But CANSLIM (in particular
> > the 1st 2 letters) is based on fundamentally
> > analyzing and accepting that
> > quarterly and annual earnings will be approximately
> > 25%.
> >
> >      However, with the accounting scandals going on,
> > and big companies like
> > Enron, WorldCom etc., being involved, will CANSLIM
> > erode in NSLIM?
> >
> > jans
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email
> > "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your
> email.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? Gene Ricci
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? Fanus
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? Spencer48@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.