From: Gene Ricci <genr@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:56:18 -0500
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] market geometry "Hill, Ernie"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] Re: Restatement of CANSLIM? "Fred Richards"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_021C_01C21DB8.802DAC20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jimmy Carter.... are you joshing??? Before you know it, Clinton will =
start looking good...
- ----- Original Message -----=20
From: Tom Worley=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?
I look at a guy like Jimmy Carter, who was not a very effective Prez, =
but is
to me a man of character. I have little doubt that there is no offer =
that
could be made to him that would work if he was on a Board, and =
detected
anything that smelled questionable to him. Don't know how many others =
there
are that both have strong moral ethics, rich enough that they don't =
need
stock options, and also have some understanding of business.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?
Tom:
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by an independent director. =
If
this
means a director who has no stake in the company's success or failure, =
I
don't know that this is an idea that should be adopted.
It seems to me that a company whose directors own a certain =
percentage
of the stock, would be more likely to have directors that care about =
that
company's future. An independent director (ie. someone who has no =
stake in
the company's future), I see as nothing but a mouthpiece for whatever
political agenda that particular director is driven by.
jans
In a message dated 6/26/2002 10:16:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
stkguru@bellsouth.net writes:
<< I would like to see the SEC mandate that the Board of Directors =
consist
of
51% independent directors in all cases. And for corps over certain =
market
value, say $1 billion, require that independent Directors be over 67% =
and
of
those Directors include at least a minority of successful, but =
retired,
businessmen or businesswomen (I nominate Katherine) that will be =
willing to
speak out publicly if necessary when they are concerned about what =
they
see.
>>
-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
- ------=_NextPart_000_021C_01C21DB8.802DAC20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4916.2300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Jimmy Carter.... are you =
joshing??? Before=20
you know it, Clinton will start looking good...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dstkguru@bellsouth.net =
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">Tom=20
Worley</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, June 26, 2002 =
10:06=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Re: =
Retstatement=20
of CANSLIM?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>I look at a guy like Jimmy Carter, who was not a very =
effective=20
Prez, but is<BR>to me a man of character. I have little doubt that =
there is no=20
offer that<BR>could be made to him that would work if he was on a =
Board, and=20
detected<BR>anything that smelled questionable to him. Don't know how =
many=20
others there<BR>are that both have strong moral ethics, rich enough =
that they=20
don't need<BR>stock options, and also have some understanding of=20
business.<BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:Spencer48@aol.com">Spencer48@aol.com</A>><BR>To: =
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
><BR>Sent:=20
Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:50 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: =
Retstatement=20
of CANSLIM?<BR><BR><BR>Tom:<BR><BR> I'm not =
entirely=20
sure what you mean by an independent director. =
If<BR>this<BR>means a=20
director who has no stake in the company's success or failure, =
I<BR>don't know=20
that this is an idea that should be =
adopted.<BR><BR> =20
It seems to me that a company whose directors own a certain =
percentage<BR>of=20
the stock, would be more likely to have directors that care about=20
that<BR>company's future. An independent director (ie. someone =
who has=20
no stake in<BR>the company's future), I see as nothing but a =
mouthpiece for=20
whatever<BR>political agenda that particular director is driven=20
by.<BR><BR>jans<BR><BR><BR>In a message dated 6/26/2002 10:16:30 PM =
Eastern=20
Daylight Time,<BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A>=20
writes:<BR><BR><< I would like to see the SEC mandate that the =
Board of=20
Directors consist<BR>of<BR> 51% independent directors in all =
cases. And=20
for corps over certain market<BR> value, say $1 billion, require =
that=20
independent Directors be over 67% and<BR>of<BR> those Directors =
include=20
at least a minority of successful, but retired,<BR> businessmen =
or=20
businesswomen (I nominate Katherine) that will be willing =
to<BR> speak=20
out publicly if necessary when they are concerned about what=20
they<BR>see.<BR> >><BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, =
email=20
"<A =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
=20
the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim". =20
Do not use quotes in your email.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To=20
subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
the=20
email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim". Do=20
not use quotes in your email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_021C_01C21DB8.802DAC20--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] market geometry "Hill, Ernie"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] Re: Restatement of CANSLIM? "Fred Richards"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]