RE: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?

From: "Mike Gibbons" <mikegibbons@proactech.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:48:42 -1000
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Where do I put my cash? KLall1112@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C21DE9.BB59B880
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>Before you know it, Clinton will start looking good...

... Compared the current incumbent's administration, at least on management
of the economy, he already does. Where's Paul O'Niel amid all the mayhem?
We've heard hardly a whisper.

Aloha,

Mike Gibbons
Proactive Technologies, LLC
http://www.proactech.com
  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Gene Ricci
  Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:56 AM
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?


  Jimmy Carter.... are you joshing??? Before you know it, Clinton will start
looking good...


  ----- Original Message -----
    From: Tom Worley
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
    Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:06 PM
    Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?


    I look at a guy like Jimmy Carter, who was not a very effective Prez,
but is
    to me a man of character. I have little doubt that there is no offer
that
    could be made to him that would work if he was on a Board, and detected
    anything that smelled questionable to him. Don't know how many others
there
    are that both have strong moral ethics, rich enough that they don't need
    stock options, and also have some understanding of business.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
    To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:50 PM
    Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?


    Tom:

         I'm not entirely sure what you mean by an independent director.  If
    this
    means a director who has no stake in the company's success or failure, I
    don't know that this is an idea that should be adopted.

         It seems to me that a company whose directors own a certain
percentage
    of the stock, would be more likely to have directors that care about
that
    company's future.  An independent director (ie. someone who has no stake
in
    the company's future), I see as nothing but a mouthpiece for whatever
    political agenda that particular director is driven by.

    jans


    In a message dated 6/26/2002 10:16:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
    stkguru@bellsouth.net writes:

    << I would like to see the SEC mandate that the Board of Directors
consist
    of
     51% independent directors in all cases. And for corps over certain
market
     value, say $1 billion, require that independent Directors be over 67%
and
    of
     those Directors include at least a minority of successful, but retired,
     businessmen or businesswomen (I nominate Katherine) that will be
willing to
     speak out publicly if necessary when they are concerned about what they
    see.
      >>

    -
    -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
    -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
    -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.




    -
    -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
    -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
    -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C21DE9.BB59B880
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D680144600-28062002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2>&gt;<FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" color=3D#000000 =
size=3D3>Before you know it,=20
Clinton will start looking good...</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D680144600-28062002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D680144600-28062002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2><FONT=20
face=3D"Comic Sans MS" color=3D#000000 size=3D3>... </FONT>Compared the =
current=20
incumbent's administration, at least on management of the economy, he =
already=20
does. Where's Paul O'Niel amid all the mayhem? We've heard hardly a =
whisper.=20
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Aloha,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Mike Gibbons<BR>Proactive Technologies, =

LLC</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://www.proactech.com/">http://www.proactech.com</A></FONT></D=
IV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
  size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
  owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Gene=20
  Ricci<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:56 AM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
  canslim@lists.xmission.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Re: =
Retstatement=20
  of CANSLIM?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Jimmy Carter.... are you=20
  joshing???&nbsp;Before you know it, Clinton will start looking=20
  good...</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    <A title=3Dstkguru@bellsouth.net =
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">Tom=20
    Worley</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, June 26, =
2002 10:06=20
    PM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Re: =
Retstatement=20
    of CANSLIM?</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>I look at a guy like Jimmy Carter, who was not a very =

    effective Prez, but is<BR>to me a man of character. I have little =
doubt that=20
    there is no offer that<BR>could be made to him that would work if he =
was on=20
    a Board, and detected<BR>anything that smelled questionable to him. =
Don't=20
    know how many others there<BR>are that both have strong moral =
ethics, rich=20
    enough that they don't need<BR>stock options, and also have some=20
    understanding of business.<BR><BR>----- Original Message =
- -----<BR>From:=20
    &lt;<A =
href=3D"mailto:Spencer48@aol.com">Spencer48@aol.com</A>&gt;<BR>To:=20
    &lt;<A=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
&gt;<BR>Sent:=20
    Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:50 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: =
Retstatement=20
    of CANSLIM?<BR><BR><BR>Tom:<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I'm not =
entirely=20
    sure what you mean by an independent director.&nbsp; =
If<BR>this<BR>means a=20
    director who has no stake in the company's success or failure, =
I<BR>don't=20
    know that this is an idea that should be=20
    adopted.<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It seems to me that a =
company whose=20
    directors own a certain percentage<BR>of the stock, would be more =
likely to=20
    have directors that care about that<BR>company's future.&nbsp; An=20
    independent director (ie. someone who has no stake in<BR>the =
company's=20
    future), I see as nothing but a mouthpiece for whatever<BR>political =
agenda=20
    that particular director is driven by.<BR><BR>jans<BR><BR><BR>In a =
message=20
    dated 6/26/2002 10:16:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time,<BR><A=20
    href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A>=20
    writes:<BR><BR>&lt;&lt; I would like to see the SEC mandate that the =
Board=20
    of Directors consist<BR>of<BR>&nbsp;51% independent directors in all =
cases.=20
    And for corps over certain market<BR>&nbsp;value, say $1 billion, =
require=20
    that independent Directors be over 67% and<BR>of<BR>&nbsp;those =
Directors=20
    include at least a minority of successful, but =
retired,<BR>&nbsp;businessmen=20
    or businesswomen (I nominate Katherine) that will be willing=20
    to<BR>&nbsp;speak out publicly if necessary when they are concerned =
about=20
    what they<BR>see.<BR>&nbsp; &gt;&gt;<BR><BR>-<BR>-To =
subscribe/unsubscribe,=20
    email "<A=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
 the=20
    email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim".&nbsp; Do=20
    not use quotes in your email.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To=20
    subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
 the=20
    email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim".&nbsp; Do=20
    not use quotes in your =
email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C21DE9.BB59B880--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.