Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?

From: "Robert Gammon" <rgammon51@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:09:07 -0500 (CDT)

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Selling question "J. Lobatto"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? "Winston Little"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM? "Winston Little"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Clinton will NEVER stand anywhere near Carter on the 
morality/ethics scale.  Clinton fans are DREAMING.

Robert
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:56:18 -0500, Gene Ricci wrote:

>Jimmy Carter.... are you joshing??? Before you know it, Clinton 
will start looking good...
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: Tom Worley 
>  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com 
>  Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:06 PM
>  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?
>
>
>  I look at a guy like Jimmy Carter, who was not a very 
effective Prez, but is
>  to me a man of character. I have little doubt that there is no 
offer that
>  could be made to him that would work if he was on a Board, and 
detected
>  anything that smelled questionable to him. Don't know how many 
others there
>  are that both have strong moral ethics, rich enough that they 
don't need
>  stock options, and also have some understanding of business.
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
>  To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
>  Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:50 PM
>  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: Retstatement of CANSLIM?
>
>
>  Tom:
>
>       I'm not entirely sure what you mean by an independent 
director.  If
>  this
>  means a director who has no stake in the company's success or 
failure, I
>  don't know that this is an idea that should be adopted.
>
>       It seems to me that a company whose directors own a 
certain percentage
>  of the stock, would be more likely to have directors that care 
about that
>  company's future.  An independent director (ie. someone who 
has no stake in
>  the company's future), I see as nothing but a mouthpiece for 
whatever
>  political agenda that particular director is driven by.
>
>  jans
>
>
>  In a message dated 6/26/2002 10:16:30 PM Eastern Daylight 
Time,
>  stkguru@bellsouth.net writes:
>
>  << I would like to see the SEC mandate that the Board of 
Directors consist
>  of
>   51% independent directors in all cases. And for corps over 
certain market
>   value, say $1 billion, require that independent Directors be 
over 67% and
>  of
>   those Directors include at least a minority of successful, 
but retired,
>   businessmen or businesswomen (I nominate Katherine) that will 
be willing to
>   speak out publicly if necessary when they are concerned about 
what they
>  see.
>    >>
>
>  -
>  -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>  -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
>  -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
>
>
>  -
>  -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>  -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
>  -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.