Re: [CANSLIM] Screening


From: "zillagirl" <zillagirl@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Screening
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:47:58 -0700

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Screening "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Screening "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C225BC.E7460400
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Messagetom-would be interested in reading the article on halliburton if =
you can tell me where to find it. Article in L.A. Times business section =
on pennystocks. Said they are becoming more popular because people are =
feeling like if they are gambling on stocks may as well be cheap ones. =
Noted WCOM went up 376% last week after new CEO came out and said it was =
to big and important a company to go under. not so much canslim note as =
M note. zillagirl
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Tom Worley=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 9:56 AM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Screening


  Duke, aside from raising my upper price limit to $20 from $18 and =
market cap from $500 million to $650 million some months ago (partially =
because of greater buying power thanks to early profits), I have made =
little change in screening. I have been far less restrictive on RS on =
stocks I already hold so long as fundamentals are holding up to my =
expectations.

  I do think there is the potential for market improvement next week, =
noticed that the 10 day moving average for up / down volume had picked =
up on most indexes, even turned positive on some, so that is =
encouraging. Most stocks are so beaten down right now it will take time =
to see the same on the 10 day new highs / lows numbers.

  There are still corporate accounting problems coming out of the =
woodwork, just read an article on Halliburton (Dick Cheney was VP there =
in 2000), and more calls for SEC investigation of Bush and his Cabinet. =
Disclosure by the House that they believe the Board of Directors of =
Enron knew for several years of what was going on is also leading to =
more politically inspired calls for reforms, and investigations of Bush. =
So the politics, if not actual news, will keep this issue in the =
forefront for some time.

  As I mentioned yesterday or Friday, the rally on Friday was primarily =
a relief rally that there was no major terrorist attack over the holiday =
(and now thru the weekend). That certainly could inspire a day or two of =
frenzied buying, by value shoppers, by sidelined cash that wants to be =
in the market, and by the shorters having to cover. I have less =
confidence that it could lead to a sustained rally on fundamentals and =
economics, even tho that would be legitimate as I see these factors.

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Duke Miller=20
  To: CANSLIM=20
  Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 12:43 PM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] Screening



  Ok, wake up out there!! =20

  Could it be that things might possibly by some mere stretch of the =
imagination...start looking up?  Is it time to proceed with some =
early-on mining?

  To that end, I went back through my CAN SLIM Keepers folder...you =
know, where I put stuff my 50-something mind needs to be refreshed upon =
because it's meaningful, and I'm prone to forgetting.  (See anecdote at =
end of this message; if it rings a bell, so to speak, you need your own =
CAN SLIM Keepers Folder!).

  Katherine Malm is in the "from" line in my Keeper folder more than =
anyone else (wonder why?), so I'm using her as the catapult for my =
query.  At the same time, I'm asking others to chime in, PLEASE. =20

  On April 29, Katherine, you summarized your screening tactics in an =
email, subject: "How are you choosing your stocks."   To paraphrase:

  RS>=3D60
  Price>=3D200dma
  Price>=3D50 dma -15%
  A/D =3D  A, B, or C
  EPS Rating =3D>50
  Meeting or exceeding these criteria, you flip through the charts to =
see which are setting up, then proceed to additional scrutiny.  The =
following is quoting directly from your email:(hilite is mine):

  With respect to annual and quarterly growth, ROE, D/E, cashflow etc., =
again, I look at these things in total, knowing that accounting rules =
often obfuscate the "real" story. For that reason, I like to skim the =
recent SEC filings if a stock makes my short due diligence list, rather =
than eliminating stocks entirely just because ROE is 14.6 vs 15% for =
example.=20
  At the risk of interrupting Katherine's summer reading program, my =
question for the week:=20

  Now that the market has dipped this far, what screen changes, if any, =
are you contemplating to narrow down your selections? =20

  I've stated before that my feeling is the stocks that have not =
succumbed as much lately (RS above 90, for instance) will be huge =
winners; they are passing "obfuscated 'real' story" scrutiny. =20

  Or will they?  Are they more havens than performers, with the prospect =
of giving way to other types of issues destined to surface into the =
winners' pool?

  Duke

  >Senior Moment:

  >An elderly couple had dinner at another couple's house, and after

  >eating, the wives left the table and went into the kitchen. The two=20

  >elderly gentlemen were talking, and one said, "Last night we went out =


  >to a new restaurant, and it was really great. I would recommend it=20

  >very highly."

  >

  >The other man said, "What is the name of the restaurant?" The first =
man

  >thought and thought and finally said, "What is the name of that =
flower=20

  >you give to someone you love? You know... the one that is red and has =


  >thorns.

  >

  >"Do you mean a rose?"

  >

  >"Yes," the man said. He turned toward the kitchen and yelled, "Hey

  >Rose, what's the name of that restaurant we went to last night?"

  >


- ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C225BC.E7460400
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>tom-would be interested in reading the =
article on=20
halliburton if you can tell me where to find it. Article in L.A. Times =
business=20
section on pennystocks. Said they are becoming more popular because =
people are=20
feeling like if they are gambling on stocks may as well be cheap ones. =
Noted=20
WCOM went up 376% last week after new CEO came out and said it was to =
big and=20
important a company to go under. not so much canslim note as M note.=20
zillagirl</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dstkguru@bellsouth.net =
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">Tom=20
  Worley</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, July 07, 2002 =
9:56 AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
Screening</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Duke, aside from raising my upper price limit =
to $20=20
  from $18 and market cap from $500 million to $650 million some months =
ago=20
  (partially because of greater buying power thanks to early profits), I =
have=20
  made little change in screening. I have been far less restrictive on =
RS on=20
  stocks I already hold so long as fundamentals are holding up to my=20
  expectations.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I do think there is the potential for market =
improvement=20
  next week, noticed that the 10 day moving average for up / down volume =
had=20
  picked up on most indexes, even turned positive on some, so that is=20
  encouraging. Most stocks are so beaten down right now it will take =
time to see=20
  the same on the 10 day new highs / lows numbers.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>There are still corporate accounting problems =
coming out=20
  of the woodwork, just read an article on Halliburton (Dick Cheney was =
VP there=20
  in 2000), and more calls for SEC investigation of Bush and his =
Cabinet.=20
  Disclosure by the House that they believe the Board of Directors of =
Enron knew=20
  for several years of what was going on is also leading to more =
politically=20
  inspired calls for reforms, and investigations of Bush. So the =
politics, if=20
  not actual news, will keep this issue in the forefront for some=20
  time.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>As I mentioned yesterday or Friday, the rally =
on Friday=20
  was primarily a relief rally that there was no major terrorist attack =
over the=20
  holiday (and now thru the weekend). That certainly could inspire a day =
or two=20
  of frenzied buying, by value shoppers, by sidelined cash that wants to =
be in=20
  the market, and by the shorters having to cover. I have less =
confidence that=20
  it could lead to a sustained rally on fundamentals and economics, even =
tho=20
  that would be legitimate as I see these factors.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20
  <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
  title=3Ddukemill@tampabay.rr.com =
href=3D"mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com">Duke=20
  Miller</A> </DIV>
  <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">CANSLIM</A> </DIV>
  <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, July 07, 2002 12:43 PM</DIV>
  <DIV><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Screening</DIV></DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT=20
face=3DArial></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT face=3DArial>Ok, wake up =
out=20
  there!!&nbsp; </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT=20
face=3DArial></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT face=3DArial>Could it be =
that things=20
  might possibly by some mere stretch of the imagination...start looking =

  up?&nbsp; Is it time to proceed with some early-on =
mining?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT=20
face=3DArial></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT face=3DArial>To that end, =
I went back=20
  through my CAN SLIM Keepers folder...you know, where I put stuff my=20
  50-something mind needs to be refreshed upon because it's meaningful, =
and I'm=20
  prone to forgetting.&nbsp; (See anecdote at end of this message; if it =
rings a=20
  bell, so to speak, you need your own CAN SLIM Keepers=20
  Folder!).</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT=20
face=3DArial></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT =
face=3DArial>Katherine&nbsp;Malm is in=20
  the "from" line in my&nbsp;Keeper folder more than anyone&nbsp;else =
(wonder=20
  why?), so&nbsp;I'm using her as the catapult for my query.&nbsp; At =
the same=20
  time, I'm asking others to chime in, PLEASE.&nbsp; =
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT=20
face=3DArial></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT face=3DArial>On April 29, =
Katherine,=20
  you summarized your screening tactics in an email, subject: "How are =
you=20
  choosing your stocks."&nbsp;&nbsp; To paraphrase:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT=20
face=3DArial></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT=20
  face=3DArial>RS&gt;=3D60</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT=20
  face=3DArial>Price&gt;=3D200dma</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT =
face=3DArial>Price&gt;=3D50 dma=20
  -15%</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT face=3DArial>A/D =3D&nbsp; =
A, B, or=20
  C</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT face=3DArial>EPS Rating=20
  =3D&gt;50</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT face=3DArial>Meeting or =
exceeding=20
  these criteria, you flip through the charts to see which are setting =
up, then=20
  proceed to additional scrutiny.&nbsp; The following is quoting =
directly from=20
  your email:(hilite is mine):</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT=20
face=3DArial></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002>With respect to annual and =
quarterly=20
  growth, ROE, D/E, cashflow etc., again, I look at these things in =
total,=20
  knowing that <FONT color=3D#ff0000>accounting rules often obfuscate =
the "real"=20
  story</FONT>. For that reason, I like to skim the recent SEC filings =
if a=20
  stock makes my short due diligence list, rather than eliminating =
stocks=20
  entirely just because ROE is 14.6 vs 15% for example. =
</SPAN></DIV><FONT=20
  size=3D2>
  <P align=3Dleft></FONT><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002>At the risk of =

  interrupting&nbsp;Katherine's summer reading program, my question for =
the=20
  week: </SPAN></P>
  <P align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT =
face=3DArial>Now that the=20
  market has dipped this far, what screen changes, if any,&nbsp;are you=20
  contemplating to narrow down your selections?&nbsp; </FONT></SPAN></P>
  <P align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT =
face=3DArial>I've stated=20
  before that my feeling is the stocks that have not succumbed as much=20
  lately&nbsp;(RS above 90, for instance) will be huge winners; =
they&nbsp;are=20
  passing "obfuscated 'real' story" scrutiny.&nbsp; </FONT></SPAN></P>
  <P align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT face=3DArial>Or =
will=20
  they?&nbsp; Are they more havens than performers, with the prospect of =
giving=20
  way to other types of issues destined to surface into the winners'=20
  pool?</FONT></SPAN></P>
  <P align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002><FONT=20
  face=3DArial>Duke</FONT></SPAN></P><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;<SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002>Senior=20
  Moment:</SPAN></FONT></P>
  <P><SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002></SPAN><FONT size=3D2><SPAN=20
  class=3D093400116-07072002>&gt;</SPAN>An elderly couple had dinner at =
another=20
  couple's house, and after</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;eating, the wives left the table and went into =
the=20
  kitchen. The two </FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;elderly gentlemen were talking, and one said, =
"Last night=20
  we went out </FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;to a new restaurant, and it was really great. I =
would=20
  recommend it </FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;very highly."</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;The other man said, "What is the name of the =
restaurant?"=20
  The first man</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;thought and thought and finally said, "What is =
the name of=20
  that flower </FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;you give to someone you love? You know... the =
one that is=20
  red and has </FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;thorns.</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;"Do you mean a rose?"</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;"Yes," the man said. He turned toward the =
kitchen and=20
  yelled, "Hey</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;Rose,<SPAN class=3D093400116-07072002> what's =
the name of=20
  that restaurant we went to last night?"</SPAN></FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=3D2>&gt;</FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></SPAN></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C225BC.E7460400--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Screening "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Screening "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.