Re: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies


From: "zillagirl" <zillagirl@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:55:37 -0700

Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies "Mike Gibbons"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies "Mike Gibbons"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Hope it materializes for both of us -Thanks Duke-your a Prince!!!
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies


> Thank you Zilla,
> 
> I'll take a look at it.  Got a good slogan for them:  "Not a dry eye in
> the house!"
> 
> Us ad guys got all the shots, don't we?
> 
> Duke
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of zillagirl
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:26 PM
> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies
> 
> 
> duke-I own a few shares of  a company that might have a future with
> boomers in healthcare. The symbol is ISPH. The company developed a
> prescription drug to treat 'dry eye condition'. It has gotten stage III
> approval from the FDA
> but not final approval to produce yet.   If and when they get this they
> expect to be to market in apx. 1 year.   No competitive treatment except
> surgery.    I saw CEO on TV and she estimated it to be a  700 million
> dollar
> market.  The condition affects primarily older women.  At present time
> apx. 10 million women have this problem-many more will develop it as the
> boomers
> get older.       It is not a canslim stock but it does have the N if
> nothing
> else.  Its about 3.50 a share now.   In January it gapped way down
> because
> it didn't get the 3rd stage approval, had to do more work -did it - and
> got
> approval.  It ran up to 16.00 a share in anticipation in Jan.   If it
> doesn't fall through the proverbial cracks I believe this stock could
> very well become a canslim stock in the future. May want to watch if
> nothing
> else.      These are the kind of microcaps I try to find.   Most canslim
> stocks were like this at one time-struggled their way up -became the
> perfect stock to buy  on a breakout on heavy volume.  More risk but
> potentially more reward it the stars are aligned just right(smile)
> zillagirl
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 5:24 AM
> Subject: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies
> 
> 
> > WON would tell you you're correct about the market telling us 
> > (hopefully before "the middle of the next bull market") the identity 
> > of the next leading groups.
> >
> > As some of you know, because I've leaned this way more than once on 
> > this list, I'm mining for companies that can turn big profits from the
> 
> > wave of boomers heading for retirement.  I call these my Boomer 
> > Babies.  For instance, right now, you're seeing boomers drive the 
> > high-end housing markets, and don't forget the impact of their 
> > off-spring in this search, i.e., HOTT, et al.
> >
> > A recent Smart Money column listed some Boomer Babies; a list of 
> > "...the best names in each of the major health-care industries: 
> > pharmacy, devices, biotech, hospitals, drug distributors, and 
> > health-care conglomerates."  They listed AMGN, BAX, CAH, JNJ, NVS, 
> > PFE, THC. The article did not mention boomers, but my assumption is 
> > healthcare is very much boomer driven and that will only increase as 
> > they age. Granted, these are not exactly "N" stocks, but very soon 
> > they could meet the criteria for CAN SLIM.  I quote again from the 
> > article: "Two years ago, health-care stocks were pricey, but now much 
> > of the sector is at that sweet spot where fundamentals are turning up 
> > just as stock prices are bottoming out." (This was written June 24, 
> > well before the "bottom" we're at now!)
> >
> > I guess the problem, as it relates to CAN SLIM, is boomer babies more 
> > likely will be spread across numerous industry groups, and as we say 
> > in today's Corner, next to markets, the groups rule.  Most of the 
> > time, anyway.
> >
> > So, that's the mine I'm panning for gold in at this time whilst 
> > perched atop my stash of cash.  If you have any suggestions, I'll be 
> > gladly be the repository for Boomer Babies and keep a list going.  
> > (During the coming week I will be sorting through six months of IBD's,
> 
> > scouring New America and other areas for some gems to add to my list.)
> >
> > Duke
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com 
> > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Wahl
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:48 PM
> > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] sweet chart
> >
> >
> > I see a few charts holding up (adult education type stuff like COCO) 
> > and a few retailers, but these don't seem like industries that produce
> 
> > market leaders (I guess a
> > few retailers in the past have been leaders, like WMT and HD), so I'm
> > still not able
> > to figure out which industries might produce the next batch of leading
> > stocks.  We
> > really had a technology explosion in the nineties, a number of tech
> > sectors grew like
> > crazy, but now bunches of them (DELL, MSFT, INTC, etc) seem like
> mature
> > companies that are too large to produce rapid growth, and their
> > respective
> > businesses aren't growing as quickly anymore either.  I suppose sooner
> > or later
> > some new industries will emerge, it will become clear in about the
> > middle of the
> > next bull market.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10 Jul 2002 at 21:31, Tom Worley wrote:
> >
> > > On the other hand, this is an excellent time to be honing our chart 
> > > reading skills, and looking for the ones that are holding up. 
> > > Chances are that the future leaders, whether they emerge this month,
> 
> > > year, decade (century??) will come from that group.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe 
> > canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe 
> > canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> 
> 
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> 


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies "Mike Gibbons"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies "Mike Gibbons"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.