Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap?

From: "zillagirl" <zillagirl@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap?
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:13:46 -0700

Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Too Much Building "zillagirl"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap? Chazmoore@aol.com
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Cheap? "Fred Richards"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C22CB1.78865BE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank you Charley , I see your point,but in your opinion is it realistic =
to think we have to do a retracement to an S&P 500 P/E ratio of 14-or =
15% to feel safe that the market is where it is meant to be?  Or could =
we assume if supply and demand does have an effect on the "P", maybe we =
need to get back to a P/E of say 24%(pulled out of a hat for example =
purposes.)
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Chazmoore@aol.com=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:43 AM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap?


  Zillagirl: You may have a point, but I suspect the high S&P 500 P/E is =
more a function of large techs that are still overpriced. When you look =
a many of the industry groups within the 500, the P/E's are low.=20
  Take a look a the large insurance groups with P/E's in the 20 range, =
or GE at 19, versus EBAY at 109 and INTC at 37.=20

  Charley=20

- ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C22CB1.78865BE0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thank you Charley&nbsp;, I see your =
point,but in=20
your opinion is it realistic to think we have to&nbsp;do a retracement =
to an=20
S&amp;P 500 P/E ratio of 14-or 15% to feel safe that the market is where =
it is=20
meant to be?&nbsp; Or could we assume if supply and demand does have an =
effect=20
on the "P", maybe we need to get back to a P/E of say 24%(pulled out of =
a hat=20
for example purposes.)</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3DChazmoore@aol.com=20
  href=3D"mailto:Chazmoore@aol.com">Chazmoore@aol.com</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, July 16, 2002 =
9:43=20
AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
Cheap?</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT size=3D2>Zillagirl: =
You may have=20
  a point, but I suspect the high S&amp;P 500 P/E is more a function of =
large=20
  techs that are still overpriced. When you look a many of the industry =
groups=20
  within the 500, the P/E's are low. <BR>Take a look a the large =
insurance=20
  groups with P/E's in the 20 range, or GE at 19, versus EBAY at 109 and =
INTC at=20
  37. <BR><BR>Charley</FONT> </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C22CB1.78865BE0--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.