Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "zillagirl" <zillagirl@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap?
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:13:46 -0700
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Cheap? "Fred Richards"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap? "Winston Little"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap? Chazmoore@aol.com
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Cheap? "Fred Richards"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C22CB1.78865BE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you Charley , I see your point,but in your opinion is it realistic = to think we have to do a retracement to an S&P 500 P/E ratio of 14-or = 15% to feel safe that the market is where it is meant to be? Or could = we assume if supply and demand does have an effect on the "P", maybe we = need to get back to a P/E of say 24%(pulled out of a hat for example = purposes.) ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Chazmoore@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap? Zillagirl: You may have a point, but I suspect the high S&P 500 P/E is = more a function of large techs that are still overpriced. When you look = a many of the industry groups within the 500, the P/E's are low.=20 Take a look a the large insurance groups with P/E's in the 20 range, = or GE at 19, versus EBAY at 109 and INTC at 37.=20 Charley=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C22CB1.78865BE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thank you Charley , I see your = point,but in=20 your opinion is it realistic to think we have to do a retracement = to an=20 S&P 500 P/E ratio of 14-or 15% to feel safe that the market is where = it is=20 meant to be? Or could we assume if supply and demand does have an = effect=20 on the "P", maybe we need to get back to a P/E of say 24%(pulled out of = a hat=20 for example purposes.)</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3DChazmoore@aol.com=20 href=3D"mailto:Chazmoore@aol.com">Chazmoore@aol.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, July 16, 2002 = 9:43=20 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] = Cheap?</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT size=3D2>Zillagirl: = You may have=20 a point, but I suspect the high S&P 500 P/E is more a function of = large=20 techs that are still overpriced. When you look a many of the industry = groups=20 within the 500, the P/E's are low. <BR>Take a look a the large = insurance=20 groups with P/E's in the 20 range, or GE at 19, versus EBAY at 109 and = INTC at=20 37. <BR><BR>Charley</FONT> </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C22CB1.78865BE0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Cheap? "Fred Richards"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap? "Winston Little"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap? Chazmoore@aol.com
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Cheap? "Fred Richards"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]