Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap?

From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap?
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 23:17:22 -0400

Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Cheap? "Fred Richards"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] chart reading "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Cheap? "Fred Richards"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Cheap? "Fred Richards"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01C22D1E.F02831B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

be careful in looking at PE ratios without regard to industry groups. =
Different groups historically and traditionally carry substantially =
different PE ratios. Where a 20 in the insurance group might be =
considered pricy, it could be cheap in a tech stock where expectations =
may be for 30% or 50% growth.

- ----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chazmoore@aol.com=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap?


Zillagirl: You may have a point, but I suspect the high S&P 500 P/E is =
more a function of large techs that are still overpriced. When you look =
a many of the industry groups within the 500, the P/E's are low.=20
Take a look a the large insurance groups with P/E's in the 20 range, or =
GE at 19, versus EBAY at 109 and INTC at 37.=20

Charley=20

- ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01C22D1E.F02831B0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>be careful in looking at PE ratios without =
regard to=20
industry groups. Different groups historically and traditionally carry=20
substantially different PE ratios. Where a 20 in the insurance group =
might be=20
considered pricy, it could be cheap in a tech stock where expectations =
may be=20
for 30% or 50% growth.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20
<DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
title=3DChazmoore@aol.com =
href=3D"mailto:Chazmoore@aol.com">Chazmoore@aol.com</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:43 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Cheap?</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT size=3D2>Zillagirl: =
You may have a=20
point, but I suspect the high S&amp;P 500 P/E is more a function of =
large techs=20
that are still overpriced. When you look a many of the industry groups =
within=20
the 500, the P/E's are low. <BR>Take a look a the large insurance groups =
with=20
P/E's in the 20 range, or GE at 19, versus EBAY at 109 and INTC at 37.=20
<BR><BR>Charley</FONT> </FONT></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01C22D1E.F02831B0--



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.