Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "J. Lobatto" <jlobatto@nyc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Housing stocks
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:45:33 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] List FAQ "Duke Miller"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] CharlY's question michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0082_01C22E37.7ADEDCA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, You may be right, but I'd contrast the action of the housing stocks to = the HMOs. Both have been very strong groups this year. However, in the = recent correction, the housing stocks have been battered down far more = than the HMOs. The latter were up strongly yesterday, while the former = dropped a bit more. Of course there is tremendous rotation in this = market and the opposite might happen today, but to my eyes, it would = appear that the housing stocks are in more serious trouble. Jon ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:00 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Housing stocks I disagree, Jon, and for opposite reasons. The housing stocks have = done very well in a market that has continued to trend ever lower. For = just that reason, those investors that chose to stay invested on the = long side (me and two others, I think), would be more likely to take = profits on the housing stocks to jump into some "momentum" big or mid = caps when the rallies start and look like they could take off. I see this especially on a lot of my small / micro caps that have done = well, when the market rallies on heavy volume from the very liquid big = cap names, the little guys tend to either sell off or at least not get = any new money running into them, all the action is concentrated on the = bigger names where less risk is perceived against the perceived "value" = (everyone loved them at $45, so they must be a real bargain at $18). ----- Original Message -----=20 From: J. Lobatto=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:29 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Housing stocks Another negative sign are the once mighty housing stocks. This group = has been a leader all year reflecting the hosuing boom we've discussed = here before. In the past couple of weeks these stocks have been = hammered. If these stocks were going to bounce back (as they've done = before), today's rally should have been the perfect opportunity, but it = appears they are now leading the retreat down. Jon=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0082_01C22E37.7ADEDCA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff>Tom,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff>You may be right, but I'd = contrast the=20 action of the housing stocks to the HMOs. Both have been very strong = groups this=20 year. However, in the recent correction, the housing stocks have been = battered=20 down far more than the HMOs. The latter were up strongly yesterday, = while the=20 former dropped a bit more. Of course there is tremendous rotation in = this market=20 and the opposite might happen today, but to my eyes, it would appear = that the=20 housing stocks are in more serious trouble.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff>Jon</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dstkguru@bellsouth.net = href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">Tom=20 Worley</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 17, 2002 = 11:00=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Housing=20 stocks</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I disagree, Jon, and for opposite reasons. The = housing=20 stocks have done very well in a market that has continued to trend = ever lower.=20 For just that reason, those investors that chose to stay invested on = the long=20 side (me and two others, I think), would be more likely to take = profits on the=20 housing stocks to jump into some "momentum" big or mid caps when the = rallies=20 start and look like they could take off.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I see this especially on a lot of my small / = micro caps=20 that have done well, when the market rallies on heavy volume from the = very=20 liquid big cap names, the little guys tend to either sell off or at = least not=20 get any new money running into them, all the action is concentrated on = the=20 bigger names where less risk is perceived against the perceived = "value"=20 (everyone loved them at $45, so they must be a real bargain at=20 $18).</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20 title=3Djlobatto@nyc.rr.com href=3D"mailto:jlobatto@nyc.rr.com">J. = Lobatto</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:29 AM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Housing stocks</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff>Another negative sign are = the once=20 mighty housing stocks. This group has been a leader all year = reflecting the=20 hosuing boom we've discussed here before. In the past couple of weeks = these=20 stocks have been hammered. If these stocks were going to bounce back = (as=20 they've done before), today's rally should have been the perfect = opportunity,=20 but it appears they are now leading the retreat down.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20 color=3D#0000ff>Jon</FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0082_01C22E37.7ADEDCA0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] List FAQ "Duke Miller"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] CharlY's question michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]