Re: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink???


From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink???
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 12:02:44 -0400

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] LLUR "Norman"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] "M" by the indexes "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Bill, I tend to agree with you, I expect a "base" to have a horizontal
component more than a vertical one. I would tend to call this a correction,
or a consolidation of recent gains, and that it was done on light volume
would be encouraging. Then again, a healthy correction or consolidation is a
type of basing pattern in a larger pattern.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Triffet" <btriffet@earthlink.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink???



Tom,

Sorry, I wasn't more clear. The period I was referring to was the Aug - Sept
period referred to as a "2nd stage base" on the IBD weblink chart. Take a
look at:   http://www.investors.com/weblink/weblinkarch01.asp  (it's a
non-subscriber area). I was just having a hard time calling that period a
"base". It's rather steep though like you'll see, low volume.

- -Bill

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink???


> Bill, you don't mention what the period is that is being used, but if it
is
> the past six trading days, the steepness of that decline to me is a
"cliff",
> not a handle.  My very loose definition of a "handle" still requires some
> kind of horizontal orientation, rather than a near vertical pitch. And
> volume for the past six days was at or over ADV every day, and down on
price
> each day as well.
>
> I would have expected at least some logical support just under 40, it went
> right thru that support area without hesitation, that's a weak signal in
my
> book.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Triffet" <btriffet@earthlink.net>
> To: "canslim" <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 6:49 PM
> Subject: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink???
>
>
> Anyone catch the Investors.com weblink? http://www.investors.com/weblink/
> It's describing the action of ACMR. Now, look at what they define as a
> "second stage base"
> Yes, volume dried up for that period but look at the price swing - an over
> 20% decline from the previous high to the intraday low. I wouldn't have
> considered that a base at all. I guess the lack of volume is the key to
> interpreting that base? Perhaps I need to also consider the previous 79%
> gains based on the breakout from the first stage?
>
> Bill Triffet
>
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.




- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] LLUR "Norman"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] "M" by the indexes "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.