Re: [CANSLIM] HTRN

From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTRN
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 08:37:37 -0600

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] HTRN Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Date): A/D (was: [CANSLIM] Was yesterday's rally for real?) "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] HTRN Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

If the primary focus of most investors is to go long, and there has been almost no 
way to make money (a few exceptions) by going long, then you are correct, it has 
worked well because it has kept us out of the market.  Simply not losing money is 
sometimes a good thing.

On 24 Jul 2002 at 22:31, Mike Lucero wrote:

> I was going to say CANSLIM hasn't worked very well since the bear market
> began, but if you were following CANSLIM, you wouldn't be going against the
> market. So, maybe CANSLIM is working fine.

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.