Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic


From: "zillagirl" <zillagirl@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:34:16 -0700

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic "Donald Wallker"
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] banks "Fred Richards"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic "Donald Wallker"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


I sometimes get the feeling CNBC doesn't care so much what is said as long
as the conversation keeps moving.  They had a guest on yesterday talking
about the new bankruptcy laws-said it would stop all these CEOs from
building 20 million dollar houses and shielding them from bankruptcy.  Yet
there was an in-depth article on the marketwatch site  yesterday about what
is wrong with the new laws and one of the major points was that these people
would still be shielded  while the little people , out of work, in a
recession would have less protection.
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "David Taggart" <dctag@mavericktrading.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Cramer


> They both said it.  Cramers old hedge partner endorsed WON's last book 24
> essential lessons and their fund was and Berkowitz's still is pretty
active
> in the high growth momentum stocks.  But Kudlows comment was just funny,
he
> knows they only have so much time for the show and yet he asks a question
> that any WON student would know is a waste of time to ask but oh well.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Spencer48@aol.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:59 AM
> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer
>
>
> Canslimmers:
>
>      I can't believe how many people answered David's E-mail which said
that
> Kudlow said that he reads IBD.  I saw the show, and am pretty certain it
was
> Kramer who said that he (Kramer) reads, and-in effect-is an avid follower
of
> WON's theories.
>
>      Moreover, I thought I was a pretty apropos question.  Not everyone
> subscribes to IBD and knows that WON doesn't pay much attention to PEs.
> Also, I was interested in hearing if WON has changed his opinion on
"...not
> paying attention to PEs"-especially in regard to the earnings scandals in
> the Bear market.
>
>                                    jans
>
>
> In a message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2002 7:38:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> alensing@prodigy.net writes:
>
> > David:
> >
> > Great point!
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Taggart
> > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:29 PM
> > Subject: [CANSLIM] Cramer
> >
> >
> > Gotta love the P/E ?  Kudlow asked WON about P/E he says I dont really
pay
> attention to it.  If he really reads the
> > paper why did he bother asking that question?
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic "Donald Wallker"
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] banks "Fred Richards"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic "Donald Wallker"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.