Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: Gene Ricci <genr@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:27:12 -0500
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer "Chuck Dreier"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0439_01C2389E.5C103730 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I find CNBC to be knowledgeable when the 'mute' button is on! ----- Original Message -----=20 From: zillagirl=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:15 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic That's what I mean. This guy on CNBC specifically said the new = bankruptcy law being proposed would put a stop to that loophole. The marketwatch article specifically said it wouldn't. It made me feel like the guy = on CNBC was trying to get people on the side of the new law by misquoting = "just a little". ----- Original Message ----- From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:58 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic > The laws relating to housing are state laws, not federal. Here in > Florida, we've become known as a haven for these jerks, because we = have > a homestead law that says if you're homesteaded in Florida (reside = in > your home here at least 6 months and one day)your home is protected = from > any proceedings, like bankruptcy, except drug law violations. One = of > our more notorious leading citizens who has taken advantage of this = is > none other than OJ Simpson. So we've attracted a bunch like him who > before they're charged or found guilty put whatever millions they = can > into a home. (I guess they then live the rest of their lives off = the > proceeds of home equity loans!) > > Duke > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of zillagirl > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:34 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic > > > I sometimes get the feeling CNBC doesn't care so much what is said = as > long as the conversation keeps moving. They had a guest on = yesterday > talking about the new bankruptcy laws-said it would stop all these = CEOs > from building 20 million dollar houses and shielding them from > bankruptcy. Yet there was an in-depth article on the marketwatch = site > yesterday about what is wrong with the new laws and one of the major > points was that these people would still be shielded while the = little > people , out of work, in a recession would have less protection. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Taggart" <dctag@mavericktrading.com> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:56 AM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Cramer > > > > They both said it. Cramers old hedge partner endorsed WON's last = book > > > 24 essential lessons and their fund was and Berkowitz's still is > > pretty > active > > in the high growth momentum stocks. But Kudlows comment was just > > funny, > he > > knows they only have so much time for the show and yet he asks a > > question that any WON student would know is a waste of time to ask = but > > > oh well. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of > > Spencer48@aol.com > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:59 AM > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer > > > > > > Canslimmers: > > > > I can't believe how many people answered David's E-mail which > > said > that > > Kudlow said that he reads IBD. I saw the show, and am pretty = certain > > it > was > > Kramer who said that he (Kramer) reads, and-in effect-is an avid > > follower > of > > WON's theories. > > > > Moreover, I thought I was a pretty apropos question. Not > > everyone subscribes to IBD and knows that WON doesn't pay much > > attention to PEs. Also, I was interested in hearing if WON has = changed > > > his opinion on > "...not > > paying attention to PEs"-especially in regard to the earnings = scandals > > > in the Bear market. > > > > jans > > > > > > In a message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2002 7:38:45 PM Eastern Standard = Time, > > alensing@prodigy.net writes: > > > > > David: > > > > > > Great point! > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: David Taggart > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:29 PM > > > Subject: [CANSLIM] Cramer > > > > > > > > > Gotta love the P/E ? Kudlow asked WON about P/E he says I dont > > > really > pay > > attention to it. If he really reads the > > > paper why did he bother asking that question? > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe > > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe > > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_0439_01C2389E.5C103730 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4916.2300" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">I find CNBC to be knowledgeable = when the=20 'mute' button is on!</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dzillagirl@email.msn.com=20 href=3D"mailto:zillagirl@email.msn.com">zillagirl</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 31, 2002 = 2:15=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] = Cramer-off=20 topic</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>That's what I mean. This guy on CNBC specifically = said=20 the new bankruptcy<BR>law being proposed would put a stop to that=20 loophole. The marketwatch<BR>article specifically said it=20 wouldn't. It made me feel like the guy on CNBC<BR>was trying to = get=20 people on the side of the new law by misquoting "just = a<BR>little".<BR>-----=20 Original Message -----<BR>From: "Duke Miller" <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com">dukemill@tampabay.rr.com</A>>= <BR>To:=20 <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= ><BR>Sent:=20 Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:58 AM<BR>Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off = topic<BR><BR><BR>> The laws relating to housing are state laws, not = federal. Here in<BR>> Florida, we've become known as a haven = for=20 these jerks, because we have<BR>> a homestead law that says if = you're=20 homesteaded in Florida (reside in<BR>> your home here at least 6 = months and=20 one day)your home is protected from<BR>> any proceedings, like = bankruptcy,=20 except drug law violations. One of<BR>> our more notorious = leading=20 citizens who has taken advantage of this is<BR>> none other than OJ = Simpson. So we've attracted a bunch like him who<BR>> before = they're=20 charged or found guilty put whatever millions they can<BR>> into a=20 home. (I guess they then live the rest of their lives off = the<BR>>=20 proceeds of home equity loans!)<BR>><BR>> Duke<BR>><BR>>=20 -----Original Message-----<BR>> From: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com">owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com</A><BR>>=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of = zillagirl<BR>> Sent:=20 Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:34 PM<BR>> To: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= <BR>>=20 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic<BR>><BR>><BR>> I = sometimes=20 get the feeling CNBC doesn't care so much what is said as<BR>> long = as the=20 conversation keeps moving. They had a guest on yesterday<BR>> = talking=20 about the new bankruptcy laws-said it would stop all these = CEOs<BR>> from=20 building 20 million dollar houses and shielding them from<BR>>=20 bankruptcy. Yet there was an in-depth article on the marketwatch = site<BR>> yesterday about what is wrong with the new laws and one = of the=20 major<BR>> points was that these people would still be = shielded while=20 the little<BR>> people , out of work, in a recession would have = less=20 protection.<BR>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>> From: "David = Taggart"=20 <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:dctag@mavericktrading.com">dctag@mavericktrading.com</A>&g= t;<BR>>=20 To: <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= ><BR>>=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:56 AM<BR>> Subject: RE: [CANSLIM]=20 Cramer<BR>><BR>><BR>> > They both said it. Cramers = old hedge=20 partner endorsed WON's last book<BR>><BR>> > 24 essential = lessons and=20 their fund was and Berkowitz's still is<BR>> > pretty<BR>>=20 active<BR>> > in the high growth momentum stocks. But = Kudlows=20 comment was just<BR>> > funny,<BR>> he<BR>> > knows = they only=20 have so much time for the show and yet he asks a<BR>> > question = that=20 any WON student would know is a waste of time to ask = but<BR>><BR>> >=20 oh well.<BR>> ><BR>> > -----Original Message-----<BR>> = >=20 From: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com">owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com</A><BR>>=20 > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of<BR>> = > <A=20 href=3D"mailto:Spencer48@aol.com">Spencer48@aol.com</A><BR>> > = Sent:=20 Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:59 AM<BR>> > To: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= <BR>>=20 > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> = >=20 Canslimmers:<BR>> ><BR>> > I = can't=20 believe how many people answered David's E-mail which<BR>> >=20 said<BR>> that<BR>> > Kudlow said that he reads IBD. I = saw the=20 show, and am pretty certain<BR>> > it<BR>> was<BR>> > = Kramer=20 who said that he (Kramer) reads, and-in effect-is an avid<BR>> > = follower<BR>> of<BR>> > WON's theories.<BR>> ><BR>>=20 > Moreover, I thought I was a pretty = apropos=20 question. Not<BR>> > everyone subscribes to IBD and knows = that WON=20 doesn't pay much<BR>> > attention to PEs. Also, I was interested = in=20 hearing if WON has changed<BR>><BR>> > his opinion on<BR>> = "...not<BR>> > paying attention to PEs"-especially in regard to = the=20 earnings scandals<BR>><BR>> > in the Bear market.<BR>>=20 ><BR>>=20 = > &nb= sp; &nbs= p; =20 jans<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > In a message dated Mon, 29 = Jul=20 2002 7:38:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,<BR>> > <A=20 href=3D"mailto:alensing@prodigy.net">alensing@prodigy.net</A> = writes:<BR>>=20 ><BR>> > > David:<BR>> > ><BR>> > > = Great=20 point!<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > ----- = Original=20 Message -----<BR>> > > From: David Taggart<BR>> > > = To: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= <BR>>=20 > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:29 PM<BR>> > > = Subject:=20 [CANSLIM] Cramer<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > = Gotta=20 love the P/E ? Kudlow asked WON about P/E he says I dont<BR>> = >=20 > really<BR>> pay<BR>> > attention to it. If he = really reads=20 the<BR>> > > paper why did he bother asking that = question?<BR>>=20 ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > -<BR>> > -To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; >=20 -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe<BR>> = >=20 canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>> ><BR>>=20 ><BR>> > -<BR>> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; >=20 -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe<BR>> = >=20 canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>>=20 ><BR>><BR>><BR>> -<BR>> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, = email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; -In=20 the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> -"unsubscribe=20 canslim". Do not use quotes in your=20 email.<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> -<BR>> -To = subscribe/unsubscribe,=20 email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; -In=20 the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> -"unsubscribe=20 canslim". Do not use quotes in your = email.<BR>><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe = canslim". Do=20 not use quotes in your email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0439_01C2389E.5C103730-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer "Chuck Dreier"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]