Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Donald Wallker" <dougald@dmv.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:56:59 -0400
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Tomorrow "zillagirl"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C238B3.490019C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
avid--- Thank you for the feedback Donald=20
----- Original Message -----=20
From: David Taggart=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 4:12 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
I work in a trading room and its pretty much unanimous that we trade =
better with ESPN on than CNBC.=20
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com =
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of zillagirl
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:05 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
I pretty much agree-I mainly listen to it to get info on new =
products and to see how the cheats work.(Like the guy with the =
bankruptcy misstatement.) The more you see their game-the more you know =
to watch out for yourself. Its a kind of education on its own.=20
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Gene Ricci=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
I find CNBC to be knowledgeable when the 'mute' button is on!
----- Original Message -----=20
From: zillagirl=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
That's what I mean. This guy on CNBC specifically said the new =
bankruptcy
law being proposed would put a stop to that loophole. The =
marketwatch
article specifically said it wouldn't. It made me feel like the =
guy on CNBC
was trying to get people on the side of the new law by =
misquoting "just a
little".
----- Original Message -----
From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
> The laws relating to housing are state laws, not federal. =
Here in
> Florida, we've become known as a haven for these jerks, =
because we have
> a homestead law that says if you're homesteaded in Florida =
(reside in
> your home here at least 6 months and one day)your home is =
protected from
> any proceedings, like bankruptcy, except drug law violations. =
One of
> our more notorious leading citizens who has taken advantage of =
this is
> none other than OJ Simpson. So we've attracted a bunch like =
him who
> before they're charged or found guilty put whatever millions =
they can
> into a home. (I guess they then live the rest of their lives =
off the
> proceeds of home equity loans!)
>
> Duke
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of =
zillagirl
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:34 PM
> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
>
>
> I sometimes get the feeling CNBC doesn't care so much what is =
said as
> long as the conversation keeps moving. They had a guest on =
yesterday
> talking about the new bankruptcy laws-said it would stop all =
these CEOs
> from building 20 million dollar houses and shielding them from
> bankruptcy. Yet there was an in-depth article on the =
marketwatch site
> yesterday about what is wrong with the new laws and one of the =
major
> points was that these people would still be shielded while =
the little
> people , out of work, in a recession would have less =
protection.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Taggart" <dctag@mavericktrading.com>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:56 AM
> Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Cramer
>
>
> > They both said it. Cramers old hedge partner endorsed WON's =
last book
>
> > 24 essential lessons and their fund was and Berkowitz's =
still is
> > pretty
> active
> > in the high growth momentum stocks. But Kudlows comment was =
just
> > funny,
> he
> > knows they only have so much time for the show and yet he =
asks a
> > question that any WON student would know is a waste of time =
to ask but
>
> > oh well.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of
> > Spencer48@aol.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:59 AM
> > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer
> >
> >
> > Canslimmers:
> >
> > I can't believe how many people answered David's E-mail =
which
> > said
> that
> > Kudlow said that he reads IBD. I saw the show, and am =
pretty certain
> > it
> was
> > Kramer who said that he (Kramer) reads, and-in effect-is an =
avid
> > follower
> of
> > WON's theories.
> >
> > Moreover, I thought I was a pretty apropos question. =
Not
> > everyone subscribes to IBD and knows that WON doesn't pay =
much
> > attention to PEs. Also, I was interested in hearing if WON =
has changed
>
> > his opinion on
> "...not
> > paying attention to PEs"-especially in regard to the =
earnings scandals
>
> > in the Bear market.
> >
> > jans
> >
> >
> > In a message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2002 7:38:45 PM Eastern =
Standard Time,
> > alensing@prodigy.net writes:
> >
> > > David:
> > >
> > > Great point!
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: David Taggart
> > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:29 PM
> > > Subject: [CANSLIM] Cramer
> > >
> > >
> > > Gotta love the P/E ? Kudlow asked WON about P/E he says I =
dont
> > > really
> pay
> > attention to it. If he really reads the
> > > paper why did he bother asking that question?
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or =
- -"unsubscribe
> > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or =
- -"unsubscribe
> > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
>
-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C238B3.490019C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>avid--- Thank you for the =
feedback Donald=20
</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Ddctag@mavericktrading.com=20
href=3D"mailto:dctag@mavericktrading.com">David Taggart</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 31, 2002 =
4:12=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [CANSLIM] =
Cramer-off=20
topic</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D169051120-31072002><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>I=20
work in a trading room and its pretty much unanimous that =
we trade better=20
with ESPN on than CNBC. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com">owner-canslim@lists.xmis=
sion.com</A>=20
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]<B>On Behalf Of=20
</B>zillagirl<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:05 =
PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
<BR><B>Subject:</B>=20
Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I pretty much agree-I mainly listen =
to it to=20
get info on new products and to see how the cheats work.(Like the =
guy with=20
the bankruptcy misstatement.) The more you see their game-the =
more you=20
know to watch out for yourself. Its a kind of education on its =
own. </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dgenr@swbell.net href=3D"mailto:genr@swbell.net">Gene =
Ricci</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 31, =
2002 12:27=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
Cramer-off=20
topic</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">I find CNBC to be knowledgeable=20
when the 'mute' button is on!</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dzillagirl@email.msn.com=20
href=3D"mailto:zillagirl@email.msn.com">zillagirl</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 31, =
2002 2:15=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
Cramer-off=20
topic</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>That's what I mean. This guy on CNBC =
specifically=20
said the new bankruptcy<BR>law being proposed would put a stop =
to that=20
loophole. The marketwatch<BR>article specifically said it=20
wouldn't. It made me feel like the guy on CNBC<BR>was =
trying to=20
get people on the side of the new law by misquoting "just=20
a<BR>little".<BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "Duke =
Miller"=20
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com">dukemill@tampabay.rr.com</A>>=
<BR>To:=20
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
><BR>Sent:=20
Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:58 AM<BR>Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] =
Cramer-off=20
topic<BR><BR><BR>> The laws relating to housing are state =
laws, not=20
federal. Here in<BR>> Florida, we've become known as a =
haven=20
for these jerks, because we have<BR>> a homestead law that =
says if=20
you're homesteaded in Florida (reside in<BR>> your home here =
at least=20
6 months and one day)your home is protected from<BR>> any=20
proceedings, like bankruptcy, except drug law violations. =
One=20
of<BR>> our more notorious leading citizens who has taken =
advantage=20
of this is<BR>> none other than OJ Simpson. So we've =
attracted a=20
bunch like him who<BR>> before they're charged or found =
guilty put=20
whatever millions they can<BR>> into a home. (I guess =
they then=20
live the rest of their lives off the<BR>> proceeds of home =
equity=20
loans!)<BR>><BR>> Duke<BR>><BR>> -----Original=20
Message-----<BR>> From: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com">owner-canslim@lists.xmis=
sion.com</A><BR>>=20
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of =
zillagirl<BR>>=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:34 PM<BR>> To: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
<BR>>=20
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic<BR>><BR>><BR>> =
I=20
sometimes get the feeling CNBC doesn't care so much what is said =
as<BR>> long as the conversation keeps moving. They had =
a guest=20
on yesterday<BR>> talking about the new bankruptcy laws-said =
it would=20
stop all these CEOs<BR>> from building 20 million dollar =
houses and=20
shielding them from<BR>> bankruptcy. Yet there was an =
in-depth=20
article on the marketwatch site<BR>> yesterday about what is =
wrong=20
with the new laws and one of the major<BR>> points was that =
these=20
people would still be shielded while the little<BR>> =
people ,=20
out of work, in a recession would have less protection.<BR>> =
- -----=20
Original Message -----<BR>> From: "David Taggart" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:dctag@mavericktrading.com">dctag@mavericktrading.com</A>&g=
t;<BR>>=20
To: <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
><BR>>=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:56 AM<BR>> Subject: RE: =
[CANSLIM]=20
Cramer<BR>><BR>><BR>> > They both said it. =
Cramers old=20
hedge partner endorsed WON's last book<BR>><BR>> > 24 =
essential=20
lessons and their fund was and Berkowitz's still is<BR>> > =
pretty<BR>> active<BR>> > in the high growth momentum=20
stocks. But Kudlows comment was just<BR>> > =
funny,<BR>>=20
he<BR>> > knows they only have so much time for the show =
and yet=20
he asks a<BR>> > question that any WON student would know =
is a=20
waste of time to ask but<BR>><BR>> > oh well.<BR>>=20
><BR>> > -----Original Message-----<BR>> > From: =
<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com">owner-canslim@lists.xmis=
sion.com</A><BR>>=20
> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf =
Of<BR>> >=20
<A =
href=3D"mailto:Spencer48@aol.com">Spencer48@aol.com</A><BR>> >=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:59 AM<BR>> > To: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
<BR>>=20
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer<BR>> ><BR>> =
><BR>>=20
> Canslimmers:<BR>> ><BR>>=20
> I can't believe how many =
people=20
answered David's E-mail which<BR>> > said<BR>> =
that<BR>>=20
> Kudlow said that he reads IBD. I saw the show, and am =
pretty=20
certain<BR>> > it<BR>> was<BR>> > Kramer who said =
that he=20
(Kramer) reads, and-in effect-is an avid<BR>> > =
follower<BR>>=20
of<BR>> > WON's theories.<BR>> ><BR>>=20
> Moreover, I thought I was a =
pretty=20
apropos question. Not<BR>> > everyone subscribes to =
IBD and=20
knows that WON doesn't pay much<BR>> > attention to PEs. =
Also, I=20
was interested in hearing if WON has changed<BR>><BR>> =
> his=20
opinion on<BR>> "...not<BR>> > paying attention to=20
PEs"-especially in regard to the earnings =
scandals<BR>><BR>> >=20
in the Bear market.<BR>> ><BR>>=20
=
> &nb=
sp; &nbs=
p; =20
jans<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > In a message dated =
Mon, 29=20
Jul 2002 7:38:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,<BR>> > <A=20
href=3D"mailto:alensing@prodigy.net">alensing@prodigy.net</A>=20
writes:<BR>> ><BR>> > > David:<BR>> > =
><BR>>=20
> > Great point!<BR>> > ><BR>> > =
><BR>> >=20
> ----- Original Message -----<BR>> > > From: David=20
Taggart<BR>> > > To: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
<BR>>=20
> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:29 PM<BR>> > > =
Subject:=20
[CANSLIM] Cramer<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> =
> >=20
Gotta love the P/E ? Kudlow asked WON about P/E he says I=20
dont<BR>> > > really<BR>> pay<BR>> > attention =
to=20
it. If he really reads the<BR>> > > paper why did =
he=20
bother asking that question?<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>>=20
><BR>> > -<BR>> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, =
email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
;=20
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or=20
-"unsubscribe<BR>> > canslim". Do not use quotes in =
your=20
email.<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > -<BR>> > -To =
subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
;=20
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or=20
-"unsubscribe<BR>> > canslim". Do not use quotes in =
your=20
email.<BR>> ><BR>><BR>><BR>> -<BR>> -To=20
subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
;=20
-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> =
- -"unsubscribe=20
canslim". Do not use quotes in your=20
email.<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> -<BR>> -To=20
subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
;=20
-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> =
- -"unsubscribe=20
canslim". Do not use quotes in your=20
email.<BR>><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email =
"<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
=20
the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe=20
canslim". Do not use quotes in your=20
=
email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HT=
ML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C238B3.490019C0--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Tomorrow "zillagirl"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]