Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 00:15:47 -0400
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] buying/bear/new bull "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] banks "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0161_01C238F0.95BAA9A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable never forget about the venture capitalists, they can often have a large = position, got in early (taking far more risks), and are often intending = to hold far longer than any other institutional. Also banks can be very misleading, as they are often only the agent / = custodian for a client. Thus their holdings can often be counted = elsewhere (such as a small mutual fund, or a pension fund), and thus end = up being double counted. - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Chazmoore@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:36 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership Gene: I could be wrong about this but I think there are many different = types of institutions other than banks and mutual funds. For example, = how about pension funds and insurance companies, to name a few. I think = WON and DGO places an emphasis on mutual funds because of their research = capabilities. Like I said I could be wrong but that would explain the = big differences between mutual fund/bank ownership and the total = institutional ownership.=20 Charley=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0161_01C238F0.95BAA9A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>never forget about the venture capitalists, they = can often=20 have a large position, got in early (taking far more risks), and are = often=20 intending to hold far longer than any other institutional.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Also banks can be very misleading, as they are = often only=20 the agent / custodian for a client. Thus their holdings can often be = counted=20 elsewhere (such as a small mutual fund, or a pension fund), and thus end = up=20 being double counted.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20 title=3DChazmoore@aol.com = href=3D"mailto:Chazmoore@aol.com">Chazmoore@aol.com</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:36 PM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT size=3D2>Gene: I could = be wrong=20 about this but I think there are many different types of institutions = other than=20 banks and mutual funds. For example, how about pension funds and = insurance=20 companies, to name a few. I think WON and DGO places an emphasis on = mutual funds=20 because of their research capabilities. Like I said I could be wrong but = that=20 would explain the big differences between mutual fund/bank ownership and = the=20 total institutional ownership. <BR>Charley</FONT> </FONT></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0161_01C238F0.95BAA9A0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] buying/bear/new bull "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] banks "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]