Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership

From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 00:15:47 -0400

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] buying/bear/new bull "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0161_01C238F0.95BAA9A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

never forget about the venture capitalists, they can often have a large =
position, got in early (taking far more risks), and are often intending =
to hold far longer than any other institutional.

Also banks can be very misleading, as they are often only the agent / =
custodian for a client. Thus their holdings can often be counted =
elsewhere (such as a small mutual fund, or a pension fund), and thus end =
up being double counted.

- ----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chazmoore@aol.com=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership


Gene: I could be wrong about this but I think there are many different =
types of institutions other than banks and mutual funds. For example, =
how about pension funds and insurance companies, to name a few. I think =
WON and DGO places an emphasis on mutual funds because of their research =
capabilities. Like I said I could be wrong but that would explain the =
big differences between mutual fund/bank ownership and the total =
institutional ownership.=20
Charley=20

- ------=_NextPart_000_0161_01C238F0.95BAA9A0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>never forget about the venture capitalists, they =
can often=20
have a large position, got in early (taking far more risks), and are =
often=20
intending to hold far longer than any other institutional.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Also banks can be very misleading, as they are =
often only=20
the agent / custodian for a client. Thus their holdings can often be =
counted=20
elsewhere (such as a small mutual fund, or a pension fund), and thus end =
up=20
being double counted.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20
<DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
title=3DChazmoore@aol.com =
href=3D"mailto:Chazmoore@aol.com">Chazmoore@aol.com</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:36 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT size=3D2>Gene: I could =
be wrong=20
about this but I think there are many different types of institutions =
other than=20
banks and mutual funds. For example, how about pension funds and =
insurance=20
companies, to name a few. I think WON and DGO places an emphasis on =
mutual funds=20
because of their research capabilities. Like I said I could be wrong but =
that=20
would explain the big differences between mutual fund/bank ownership and =
the=20
total institutional ownership. <BR>Charley</FONT> </FONT></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0161_01C238F0.95BAA9A0--



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] buying/bear/new bull "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.