Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] LNOP
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:49:47 -0500
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] LNOP "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] LNOP "Donald Wallker"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C23938.63AC8E40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Congratulations on your good fortune, Donald.=20 On LNOP--When I respond to a post on the list, I respond to the subject = matter, not the person. My point was not to judge you or to accuse you = of touting a stock, simply to look at LNOP through CANSLIM eyes. As the = list is devoted to CANSLIM, it would seem appropriate to do so. The world is full of investments that do well but don't pass the = scrutiny of a CANSLIM evaluation. That's why non-CANSLIM folks also make = money. I've had countless friends, however, who have lost their = investments because they couldn't stay focused on becoming a disciplined = master of a style, but instead flitted from one investment style to = another, let their emotions override reality, and/or trusted somebody = else to tell them what to do. =20 Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Donald Wallker=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 8:32 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] LNOP Katherine ---------I agree with you about the financials of LNOP, that = is, they stink..On the other hand, I did not tout LNOP as an investment, = CANSLIM or otherwise. Rather I offered it to the group as something = they could scratch their heads about. I later remarked that I had = bought into LNOP rather than AYE for reasons having nothing to do with = CANSLIM. And made no recommendations to anyone that they should do the = same. Now, at this writing, I'm surely glad I bought in yesterday. = Today, LNOP announced that China's largest telecom equipment = manufacturer, ZTE Corp, decided to use LNOP's EZchip NP-1 processor in = their equipment. And the pre=3Dmarket price of LNOP is over %25 more = than I paid for it --=3D=3DDonald.=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C23938.63AC8E40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV>Congratulations on your good fortune, Donald. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>On LNOP--When I respond to a post on the list, I respond to the = subject=20 matter, not the person. My point was not to judge you or to accuse you = of=20 touting a stock, simply to look at LNOP through CANSLIM eyes. As the = list is=20 devoted to CANSLIM, it would seem appropriate to do so.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>The world is full of investments that do well but don't pass the = scrutiny=20 of a CANSLIM evaluation. That's why non-CANSLIM folks also make money. = I've had=20 countless friends, however, who have lost their investments because they = couldn't stay focused on becoming a disciplined master of a style, but = instead=20 flitted from one investment style to another, let their emotions = override=20 reality, and/or trusted somebody else to tell them what to = do. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Katherine</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Ddougald@dmv.com href=3D"mailto:dougald@dmv.com">Donald = Wallker</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 01, 2002 = 8:32=20 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] LNOP</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine ---------I agree with you = about the=20 financials of LNOP, that is, they stink..On the other hand, I did not = tout=20 LNOP as an investment, CANSLIM or otherwise. Rather I = offered it=20 to the group as something they could scratch their heads about. = I later=20 remarked that I had bought into LNOP rather than AYE for reasons = having=20 nothing to do with CANSLIM. And made no recommendations to = anyone=20 that they should do the same. Now, at this writing, I'm surely=20 glad I bought in yesterday. Today, LNOP announced that = China's=20 largest telecom equipment manufacturer, ZTE Corp, decided to use = LNOP's=20 EZchip NP-1 processor in their equipment. And the = pre=3Dmarket price=20 of LNOP is over %25 more than I paid for=20 it --=3D=3DDonald. </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C23938.63AC8E40-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] LNOP "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] LNOP "Donald Wallker"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]