Re: [CANSLIM] LNOP


From: "Donald Wallker" <dougald@dmv.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] LNOP
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:50:50 -0400

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] LNOP (was Tomorrow -off topic) "zillagirl"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C23949.4CCF3900
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Katherine --Thanks for your input.   I realize you are in the habit of =
addresing the subject matter, and that you do so with out rancor.  My =
apologies if I gave you the impression  that you had  offended me.  It's =
simply not true.  And, thanks for the  good wishes,  ----Donald=20
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Katherine Malm=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 9:49 AM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] LNOP


  Congratulations on your good fortune, Donald.=20

  On LNOP--When I respond to a post on the list, I respond to the =
subject matter, not the person. My point was not to judge you or to =
accuse you of touting a stock, simply to look at LNOP through CANSLIM =
eyes. As the list is devoted to CANSLIM, it would seem appropriate to do =
so.

  The world is full of investments that do well but don't pass the =
scrutiny of a CANSLIM evaluation. That's why non-CANSLIM folks also make =
money. I've had countless friends, however, who have lost their =
investments because they couldn't stay focused on becoming a disciplined =
master of a style, but instead flitted from one investment style to =
another, let their emotions override reality, and/or trusted somebody =
else to tell them what to do. =20

  Katherine
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Donald Wallker=20
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 8:32 AM
    Subject: [CANSLIM] LNOP


    Katherine ---------I agree with you about the financials of LNOP, =
that is, they stink..On the other hand, I did not tout LNOP as an =
investment,  CANSLIM or otherwise.  Rather I offered it to the group as =
something they could scratch their heads about.  I later remarked  that =
I had bought into LNOP rather than AYE for reasons having nothing to do =
with CANSLIM.   And made no recommendations to anyone that they should =
do the same.  Now, at this writing, I'm surely  glad I bought in =
yesterday.  Today, LNOP announced that China's largest telecom equipment =
manufacturer, ZTE Corp, decided to use LNOP's EZchip NP-1 processor in =
their equipment. And the pre=3Dmarket price of LNOP is over %25  more =
than I paid for it --=3D=3DDonald.=20

- ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C23949.4CCF3900
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine --Thanks for your =
input.&nbsp; &nbsp;I=20
realize you are in the habit of addresing the subject matter, and that =
you do so=20
with out rancor.&nbsp; My apologies if I gave you the impression&nbsp; =
that=20
you&nbsp;had &nbsp;offended me.&nbsp; It's simply not true.&nbsp; And, =
thanks=20
for the &nbsp;good wishes,&nbsp; ----Donald&nbsp;</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
  Malm</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 01, 2002 =
9:49=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
LNOP</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV>Congratulations on your good fortune, Donald. </DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>On LNOP--When I respond to a post on the list, I respond to the =
subject=20
  matter, not the person. My point was not to judge you or to accuse you =
of=20
  touting a stock, simply to look at LNOP through CANSLIM eyes. As the =
list is=20
  devoted to CANSLIM, it would seem appropriate to do so.</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>The world is full of investments that do well but don't pass the =
scrutiny=20
  of a CANSLIM evaluation. That's why non-CANSLIM folks also make money. =
I've=20
  had countless friends, however, who have lost their investments =
because they=20
  couldn't stay focused on becoming a disciplined master of a style, but =
instead=20
  flitted from one investment style to another, let their emotions =
override=20
  reality,&nbsp;and/or trusted somebody else to tell them what to =
do.&nbsp;=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Katherine</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    <A title=3Ddougald@dmv.com href=3D"mailto:dougald@dmv.com">Donald =
Wallker</A>=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 01, =
2002 8:32=20
    AM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] LNOP</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine ---------I agree with you =
about the=20
    financials of LNOP, that is, they stink..On the other hand, I did =
not tout=20
    LNOP as an investment,&nbsp; CANSLIM or otherwise.&nbsp; Rather I =
offered it=20
    to the group as something they could scratch their heads =
about.&nbsp; I=20
    later remarked &nbsp;that I had bought into LNOP rather than AYE for =
reasons=20
    having nothing to do with CANSLIM.&nbsp;&nbsp; And made no =
recommendations=20
    to anyone that they should do the same.&nbsp; Now, at this writing, =
I'm=20
    surely &nbsp;glad I bought in yesterday.&nbsp; Today, LNOP announced =
that=20
    China's largest telecom equipment manufacturer, ZTE Corp, =
decided&nbsp;to=20
    use LNOP's EZchip NP-1 processor&nbsp;in their&nbsp;equipment. And =
the=20
    pre=3Dmarket price of LNOP is&nbsp;over %25&nbsp; more than I paid =
for=20
    =
it&nbsp;--=3D=3DDonald.&nbsp;</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BOD=
Y></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C23949.4CCF3900--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] LNOP (was Tomorrow -off topic) "zillagirl"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.