From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 22:08:18 -0400
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Sometimes even the Pros don't know "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Moving Averages
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks Lois
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks "Matt & Alicia Leverette"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Thank you, Lois,
for the point about boomers coming of age. I found the sites you
included most interesting.
You hit my hot button, because, as you may know, I'm working on my
"Boomer Babies" (companies that will appeal to boomers) that will in
time make me rich! It's all based on the fact that, from the get-go,
boomers will change things. As a "leading edge" boomer (my wife, four
years my junior, insists I use that term) I'm testimony to that, because
they've made my life very comfortable.
Now, boomers are getting older (I know they hate to admit it), and who
do you think is going to benefit most? You got it: older people, aka
geriatric boomers. And what do older people need most? Drugs, medical
care, places to retire, travel to take, not to mention places to be
buried! And dare I omit sex? Do you think we'd have Viagra (the
greatest legalized drug of all time, according to Hugh Hefner)if it
weren't for the boomers?
Now, who will soon be the biggest, best organized lobby (if it isn't
already) in the world? AARP bay-beeeeeeee! (Darn, Austin Powers keeps
slipping in). So I read my AARP Bulletin (they start sending it to you
at age 50) regularly, looking for CANSLIM candidates (lest we get off
topic!). The question is will AARP ever outweigh Pfizer, et al, in
Congress? Hard to say, but there are an awful lot of votes in that there
pipeline!
Duke
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Lois
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:01 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks
Duke,
I agree that money talks.
I resigned from the nursing profession 9 yrs. ago. The majority of the
patients were medicaid/medicare dependant(your tax dollars) which in
turn means that generic drugs would be used over brand name drugs. Below
you will find a LINK(lol) that will project the baby boomers coming of
age. This clearly means that the healthcare/pharms/orthopedic co's will
be booming also. http://www.census.gov/prod/2/pop/p25/p25-1131.pdf
http://www.biospace.com/
I can go a little deeper with info re gov. officials that had/have their
fingers stuck in the pie, but don't know if I should here, so I won't.
Duke Miller wrote:
>
> Please note the usual operative phrase, paragraph 2: "...but it is
> unclear whether it has the support to pass." This is a euphemism for,
> "...it's clear the winner will be the boys with the bucks (read: drug
> companies)."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Lois
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:23 PM
> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks
>
> Larry, http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/7/31/151107.shtml
>
> Senate Passes Bill on Generic Drugs
>
> NewsMax.com Wires
> Thursday, Aug. 1, 2002
>
> WASHINGTON - The Senate passed a bill Wednesday
> that could
> make cheaper generic drugs more rapidly available
> and save
> consumers billions - or hamper development of
> pharmaceuticals.
>
> A similar bill has been introduced in the House,
> but it is unclear
> whether it has the support to pass.
>
> The Senate bill, sponsored by Sens. Charles
> Schumer, D-N.Y., and
> John McCain, R-Ariz., attempts to curb lawsuits
> filed by
> brand-name drug manufacturers that claim a generic
> drug infringes
> upon their patent and automatically prevents the
> generic from
> coming to market for 30 months.
>
> Under the current system, drug manufacturers can
> file multiple
> patent infringement lawsuits, thereby keeping
> generics off the
> market for years. Meanwhile, the brand-name drug
> continues to be
> sold at a higher price. Generic versions of
> brand-name drugs
> typically result in a dramatic reduction in the
> price of the drug but do
> not advance pharmaceutical research.
>
> The Senate bill limits automatic 30-month stays to
> patents the
> brand name carries at the time it is approved.
> Brand-name drug
> manufacturers can still challenge infringement upon
> patents that are
> added after approval, but they must first get the
> approval of a
> judge.
>
> Republicans opposing the bill, including Sen. Judd
> Gregg, R-N.H.,
> and brand-name drug companies maintained that the
> bill would
> reduce profits and the amount of money that could
> be spent on
> research and development. Ultimately, it would
> stifle the
> development of innovative new drugs, they said.
>
> "The only thing they have to worry about are weak
> bogus patents ...
> that they could not support before a judge," Ben
> Peck, legislative
> representative for the self-described consumer
> advocacy group
> Public Citizen, told United Press International.
>
> Sen. Robert Torricelli, D-N.J., reprimanded Tuesday
> by the Senate
> Ethics Committee, said the bill could reduce drug
> costs by up to 65
> percent and save consumers $60 billion over the
> next decade.
>
> Larry Worden wrote:
> >
> > what about (TARO) ? the generic drugs should do will in this
> > environment.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
> >
> > > David, zillagirl:
> > >
> > > I remember in the 80's during the S&L scandals, the CEO of
> > > the chief
> > S&L that defrauded despositors was found guilty in court. But he
> > had moved many of his assets to Florida, and bought many more
> > (including a
>
> > horse ranch)-and the Florida laws protected him.
> > >
> > > So, even though he was found guilty, he did not have to
> > > disgorge many
> > of his profits of his ill-gotten gains.
> > >
> > > jans
> > >
> > >
> > > In a message dated Wed, 31 Jul 2002 1:19:00 PM Eastern Standard
> > > Time,
> > dougald@dmv.com writes:
> > >
> > > > I do not see how it is going to stop anyone from building a
> > > > million
> > dollar
> > > > House. Unless,of course, something is done about Florida. As a
> > > > matter
> > of
> > > > interest, iUnder the present law if you think you are about to
> > > > go
> > bankrupt
> > > > you can always move to Florida ,where your home is immune to
> > > > the Bankruptcy Laws. For example O.J. Simpson lives in Florida
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the
> > > email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim".
> > > Do
>
> > > not use quotes in your email.
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the
> > email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do
> > not use quotes in your email.
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe
> canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe
> canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Sometimes even the Pros don't know "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Moving Averages
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks Lois
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks "Matt & Alicia Leverette"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]