RE: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks

From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 23:03:20 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks KLall1112@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks KLall1112@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
The big bucks always win!

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Winston Little
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:24 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks


Duke:

It appears that the big bucks may be winning.
The headline story of  the Detroit News of 01 August proclaimed:
"Senators give up on drug plan." The link is:
http://www.detnews.com/2002/politics/0208/01/a01-551287.htm



- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:08 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks


> Thank you, Lois,
> 
> for the point about boomers coming of age.  I found the sites you 
> included most interesting.
> 
> You hit my hot button, because, as you may know, I'm working on my 
> "Boomer Babies" (companies that will appeal to boomers) that will in 
> time make me rich!  It's all based on the fact that, from the get-go, 
> boomers will change things. As a "leading edge" boomer (my wife, four 
> years my junior, insists I use that term) I'm testimony to that, 
> because they've made my life very comfortable.
> 
> Now, boomers are getting older (I know they hate to admit it), and who

> do you think is going to benefit most?  You got it: older people, aka 
> geriatric boomers.  And what do older people need most?  Drugs, 
> medical care, places to retire, travel to take, not to mention places 
> to be buried!  And dare I omit sex?  Do you think we'd have Viagra 
> (the greatest legalized drug of all time, according to Hugh Hefner)if 
> it weren't for the boomers?
> 
> Now, who will soon be the biggest, best organized lobby (if it isn't
> already) in the world?  AARP bay-beeeeeeee! (Darn, Austin Powers keeps

> slipping in).  So I read my AARP Bulletin (they start sending it to 
> you at age 50) regularly, looking for CANSLIM candidates (lest we get 
> off topic!).  The question is will AARP ever outweigh Pfizer, et al, 
> in Congress? Hard to say, but there are an awful lot of votes in that 
> there pipeline!
> 
> Duke
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com 
> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Lois
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:01 PM
> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks
> 
> 
> Duke,
> 
>     I agree that money talks.
> 
> I resigned from the nursing profession 9 yrs. ago. The majority of the

> patients were medicaid/medicare dependant(your tax dollars) which in 
> turn means that generic drugs would be used over brand name drugs. 
> Below you will find a LINK(lol) that will project the baby boomers 
> coming of age. This clearly means that the 
> healthcare/pharms/orthopedic co's will be booming also. 
> http://www.census.gov/prod/2/pop/p25/p25-1131.pdf
> http://www.biospace.com/
> 
> I can go a little deeper with info re gov. officials that had/have 
> their fingers stuck in the pie, but don't know if I should here, so I 
> won't.
> 
> 
> 
> Duke Miller wrote:
> > 
> > Please note the usual operative phrase, paragraph 2:  "...but it is
> > unclear whether it has the support to pass."  This is a euphemism
for,
> 
> > "...it's clear the winner will be the boys with the bucks (read: 
> > drug
> > companies)."
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Lois
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:23 PM
> > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks
> > 
> > Larry, 
> > http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/7/31/151107.shtml
> > 
> >                    Senate Passes Bill on Generic Drugs
> > 
> >                         NewsMax.com Wires
> >                         Thursday, Aug. 1, 2002
> > 
> >                    WASHINGTON - The Senate passed a bill Wednesday
> > that could
> >                    make cheaper generic drugs more rapidly available

> > and save
> >                    consumers billions - or hamper development of 
> > pharmaceuticals.
> > 
> >                    A similar bill has been introduced in the House,
> > but it is unclear
> >                    whether it has the support to pass.
> > 
> >                    The Senate bill, sponsored by Sens. Charles
> > Schumer, D-N.Y., and
> >                    John McCain, R-Ariz., attempts to curb lawsuits 
> > filed by
> >                    brand-name drug manufacturers that claim a
generic 
> > drug infringes
> >                    upon their patent and automatically prevents the 
> > generic from
> >                    coming to market for 30 months.
> > 
> >                    Under the current system, drug manufacturers can
> > file multiple
> >                    patent infringement lawsuits, thereby keeping 
> > generics off the
> >                    market for years. Meanwhile, the brand-name drug 
> > continues to be
> >                    sold at a higher price. Generic versions of 
> > brand-name drugs
> >                    typically result in a dramatic reduction in the 
> > price of the drug but do
> >                    not advance pharmaceutical research.
> > 
> >                    The Senate bill limits automatic 30-month stays 
> > to
> > patents the
> >                    brand name carries at the time it is approved. 
> > Brand-name drug
> >                    manufacturers can still challenge infringement
upon
> 
> > patents that are
> >                    added after approval, but they must first get the
> > approval of a
> >                    judge.
> > 
> >                    Republicans opposing the bill, including Sen. 
> > Judd
> > Gregg, R-N.H.,
> >                    and brand-name drug companies maintained that the

> > bill would
> >                    reduce profits and the amount of money that could

> > be spent on
> >                    research and development. Ultimately, it would 
> > stifle the
> >                    development of innovative new drugs, they said.
> > 
> >                    "The only thing they have to worry about are weak
> > bogus patents ...
> >                    that they could not support before a judge," Ben 
> > Peck, legislative
> >                    representative for the self-described consumer 
> > advocacy group
> >                    Public Citizen, told United Press International.
> > 
> >                    Sen. Robert Torricelli, D-N.J., reprimanded 
> > Tuesday
> 
> > by the Senate
> >                    Ethics Committee, said the bill could reduce drug
> > costs by up to 65
> >                    percent and save consumers $60 billion over the 
> > next decade.
> > 
> > Larry Worden wrote:
> > >
> > > what about (TARO) ?  the generic drugs should do will in this
> > > environment.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:51 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic
> > >
> > > > David, zillagirl:
> > > >
> > > >      I remember in the 80's during the S&L scandals, the CEO of
> > > > the chief
> > > S&L that defrauded despositors was found guilty in court.  But he
> > > had moved many of his assets to Florida, and bought many more 
> > > (including a
> > 
> > > horse ranch)-and the Florida laws protected him.
> > > >
> > > >      So, even though he was found guilty, he did not have to
> > > > disgorge many
> > > of his profits of his ill-gotten gains.
> > > >
> > > >                              jans
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In a message dated Wed, 31 Jul 2002 1:19:00 PM Eastern Standard
> > > > Time,
> > > dougald@dmv.com writes:
> > > >
> > > > > I do not see how it is going to stop anyone from building a
> > > > > million
> > > dollar
> > > > > House.  Unless,of course, something is done about Florida. As 
> > > > > a
> > > > > matter
> > > of
> > > > > interest, iUnder the present law if you think you are about to
> > > > > go
> > > bankrupt
> > > > > you  can always move to Florida ,where your home is immune to
> > > > > the Bankruptcy Laws.  For example  O.J. Simpson lives in
Florida
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In 
> > > > the
> > > > email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim".

> > > > Do
> > 
> > > > not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the
> > > email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim".
Do
> 
> > > not use quotes in your email.
> > 
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the 
> > email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do

> > not use quotes in your email.
> > 
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the 
> > email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do

> > not use quotes in your email.
> 
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe 
> canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe 
> canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> 


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.