Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "zillagirl" <zillagirl@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 07:18:29 -0700
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Sometimes even the Pros don't know "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: TARO (was Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks) "Donald Wallker"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Thank You for the link. I've already sent my comments to the paper. I hope the rest make their voices heard also. nancy - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Winston Little" <wlittle1@peoplepc.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:23 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks > Duke: > > It appears that the big bucks may be winning. > The headline story of the Detroit News of 01 August proclaimed: > "Senators give up on drug plan." > The link is: http://www.detnews.com/2002/politics/0208/01/a01-551287.htm > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:08 PM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks > > > > Thank you, Lois, > > > > for the point about boomers coming of age. I found the sites you > > included most interesting. > > > > You hit my hot button, because, as you may know, I'm working on my > > "Boomer Babies" (companies that will appeal to boomers) that will in > > time make me rich! It's all based on the fact that, from the get-go, > > boomers will change things. As a "leading edge" boomer (my wife, four > > years my junior, insists I use that term) I'm testimony to that, because > > they've made my life very comfortable. > > > > Now, boomers are getting older (I know they hate to admit it), and who > > do you think is going to benefit most? You got it: older people, aka > > geriatric boomers. And what do older people need most? Drugs, medical > > care, places to retire, travel to take, not to mention places to be > > buried! And dare I omit sex? Do you think we'd have Viagra (the > > greatest legalized drug of all time, according to Hugh Hefner)if it > > weren't for the boomers? > > > > Now, who will soon be the biggest, best organized lobby (if it isn't > > already) in the world? AARP bay-beeeeeeee! (Darn, Austin Powers keeps > > slipping in). So I read my AARP Bulletin (they start sending it to you > > at age 50) regularly, looking for CANSLIM candidates (lest we get off > > topic!). The question is will AARP ever outweigh Pfizer, et al, in > > Congress? Hard to say, but there are an awful lot of votes in that there > > pipeline! > > > > Duke > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Lois > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:01 PM > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks > > > > > > Duke, > > > > I agree that money talks. > > > > I resigned from the nursing profession 9 yrs. ago. The majority of the > > patients were medicaid/medicare dependant(your tax dollars) which in > > turn means that generic drugs would be used over brand name drugs. Below > > you will find a LINK(lol) that will project the baby boomers coming of > > age. This clearly means that the healthcare/pharms/orthopedic co's will > > be booming also. http://www.census.gov/prod/2/pop/p25/p25-1131.pdf > > http://www.biospace.com/ > > > > I can go a little deeper with info re gov. officials that had/have their > > fingers stuck in the pie, but don't know if I should here, so I won't. > > > > > > > > Duke Miller wrote: > > > > > > Please note the usual operative phrase, paragraph 2: "...but it is > > > unclear whether it has the support to pass." This is a euphemism for, > > > > > "...it's clear the winner will be the boys with the bucks (read: drug > > > companies)." > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Lois > > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:23 PM > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks > > > > > > Larry, http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/7/31/151107.shtml > > > > > > Senate Passes Bill on Generic Drugs > > > > > > NewsMax.com Wires > > > Thursday, Aug. 1, 2002 > > > > > > WASHINGTON - The Senate passed a bill Wednesday > > > that could > > > make cheaper generic drugs more rapidly available > > > and save > > > consumers billions - or hamper development of > > > pharmaceuticals. > > > > > > A similar bill has been introduced in the House, > > > but it is unclear > > > whether it has the support to pass. > > > > > > The Senate bill, sponsored by Sens. Charles > > > Schumer, D-N.Y., and > > > John McCain, R-Ariz., attempts to curb lawsuits > > > filed by > > > brand-name drug manufacturers that claim a generic > > > drug infringes > > > upon their patent and automatically prevents the > > > generic from > > > coming to market for 30 months. > > > > > > Under the current system, drug manufacturers can > > > file multiple > > > patent infringement lawsuits, thereby keeping > > > generics off the > > > market for years. Meanwhile, the brand-name drug > > > continues to be > > > sold at a higher price. Generic versions of > > > brand-name drugs > > > typically result in a dramatic reduction in the > > > price of the drug but do > > > not advance pharmaceutical research. > > > > > > The Senate bill limits automatic 30-month stays to > > > patents the > > > brand name carries at the time it is approved. > > > Brand-name drug > > > manufacturers can still challenge infringement upon > > > > > patents that are > > > added after approval, but they must first get the > > > approval of a > > > judge. > > > > > > Republicans opposing the bill, including Sen. Judd > > > Gregg, R-N.H., > > > and brand-name drug companies maintained that the > > > bill would > > > reduce profits and the amount of money that could > > > be spent on > > > research and development. Ultimately, it would > > > stifle the > > > development of innovative new drugs, they said. > > > > > > "The only thing they have to worry about are weak > > > bogus patents ... > > > that they could not support before a judge," Ben > > > Peck, legislative > > > representative for the self-described consumer > > > advocacy group > > > Public Citizen, told United Press International. > > > > > > Sen. Robert Torricelli, D-N.J., reprimanded Tuesday > > > > > by the Senate > > > Ethics Committee, said the bill could reduce drug > > > costs by up to 65 > > > percent and save consumers $60 billion over the > > > next decade. > > > > > > Larry Worden wrote: > > > > > > > > what about (TARO) ? the generic drugs should do will in this > > > > environment. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: <Spencer48@aol.com> > > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:51 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cramer-off topic > > > > > > > > > David, zillagirl: > > > > > > > > > > I remember in the 80's during the S&L scandals, the CEO of > > > > > the chief > > > > S&L that defrauded despositors was found guilty in court. But he > > > > had moved many of his assets to Florida, and bought many more > > > > (including a > > > > > > > horse ranch)-and the Florida laws protected him. > > > > > > > > > > So, even though he was found guilty, he did not have to > > > > > disgorge many > > > > of his profits of his ill-gotten gains. > > > > > > > > > > jans > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated Wed, 31 Jul 2002 1:19:00 PM Eastern Standard > > > > > Time, > > > > dougald@dmv.com writes: > > > > > > > > > > > I do not see how it is going to stop anyone from building a > > > > > > million > > > > dollar > > > > > > House. Unless,of course, something is done about Florida. As a > > > > > > matter > > > > of > > > > > > interest, iUnder the present law if you think you are about to > > > > > > go > > > > bankrupt > > > > > > you can always move to Florida ,where your home is immune to > > > > > > the Bankruptcy Laws. For example O.J. Simpson lives in Florida > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the > > > > > email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". > > > > > Do > > > > > > > > not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > - > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the > > > > email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do > > > > > > not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe > > > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe > > > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Sometimes even the Pros don't know "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: TARO (was Re: [CANSLIM] canslim stocks) "Donald Wallker"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]