Re: [CANSLIM] OSTE


From: Chazmoore@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OSTE
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 14:03:53 EDT

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Minimum Stock Price - $10 "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Minimum Stock Price - $10 Gene Ricci
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] OSTE "Donald Wallker"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] OSTE "Donald Wallker"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


- --part1_f9.20315ce2.2a801809_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Donald: In my opinion the uncertainties surrounding a falling market simply 
make it dangerous to buy any stock at this time. If the market were 
improving, instead of declining, I would avoid this stock until the price 
exceeded $15 or $20. Low priced stocks are usually below the searchlights of 
large investors, and without an elephant or two, the stock price could creep 
along for an extended period of time.
From a fundamental point of view the company just turned profitable a couple 
of quarters ago. If you look at their EPS by quarter for the past six years, 
their experience has been spotty, at best. I want to see some Return on 
Equity before buying.
On the positive side, other companies in this group are doing well, even 
though the Group Industry Relative Strength is 68, two points below my 
personal 70 minimum.
Growth for 2003 is projected to be an 84% increase.
Without tearing it apart my impression is that this could be a successful 
company sometime in the future. It certainly wouldn't hurt to put this one on 
a watch list and see what develops. On the other hand there are other more 
mature companies further along in their development that mean more to me than 
this one. 

Charley

- --part1_f9.20315ce2.2a801809_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>Donald: In my opinion the uncertainties surrounding a falling market simply make it dangerous to buy any stock at this time. If the market were improving, instead of declining, I would avoid this stock until the price exceeded $15 or $20. Low priced stocks are usually below the searchlights of large investors, and without an elephant or two, the stock price could creep along for an extended period of time.
<BR>From a fundamental point of view the company just turned profitable a couple of quarters ago. If you look at their EPS by quarter for the past six years, their experience has been spotty, at best. I want to see some Return on Equity before buying.
<BR>On the positive side, other companies in this group are doing well, even though the Group Industry Relative Strength is 68, two points below my personal 70 minimum.
<BR>Growth for 2003 is projected to be an 84% increase.
<BR>Without tearing it apart my impression is that this could be a successful company sometime in the future. It certainly wouldn't hurt to put this one on a watch list and see what develops. On the other hand there are other more mature companies further along in their development that mean more to me than this one. 
<BR>
<BR>Charley</FONT></HTML>

- --part1_f9.20315ce2.2a801809_boundary--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Minimum Stock Price - $10 "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Minimum Stock Price - $10 Gene Ricci
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] OSTE "Donald Wallker"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] OSTE "Donald Wallker"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.