Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Mike Gibbons" <mikegibbons@proactech.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] defamation
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:19:00 -1000
Next Article (by Author): Re: OSTE (was Re: [CANSLIM] Potential canslim candiadate) "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Fw: The Importance of 'M' Lois
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] defamation "Donald Wallker"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] defamation KrisFg@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C23C93.6CE68160 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Donald, I have no doubt that you noted that I apologized to those who make a "positive constribution" to the list. I'm sure the list owner, Jeff Salisbury, would consider himself in that category and therefore considers himself aplogized to. It seems that you do not consider yourself apologized to, so I presume you don't see yourself in that category. I consider this matter closed. If you wish to persue it further please contact me off list. Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Donald Wallker Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 3:04 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] defamation I have been watching with interest the gradual unfolding of the defamation issues this forum is trying to deal with. The flat out admissiion in Mike's apology has clearly been motivated by consultation with an Attorney, or a discussion with someone who has consulted with an Attorney, familiar with Defamation Law. I really do not believe what Mike has said has anyhing to do with his character or true beliefs.. My belief is that the persons Mike should be publically apologiing to are the persons who have been the most hurt by his remarks, that is, the person he defamed and the owner of the Canslim website. The apology should be made to the person defamed for obvious reasons. On the other hand , the apology should be made to the owner of the website. because, due to his review of the subject matter before it is published he has opened himself up to a libel suit, if brought by the person who has been defamed. I hope this entire matter will soon be brought to a close, that is, by by putting a stop to this nonsense, since I, for one, do not want to get involved in litigation, even though I am a retired Attorney who could get involved with a litigtion mattter without great personal cost. - ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C23C93.6CE68160 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><SPAN class=3D210001301-06082002><FONT face=3DTahoma = color=3D#0000ff=20 size=3D2>Donald,</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=3D210001301-06082002><FONT face=3DTahoma = color=3D#0000ff=20 size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=3D210001301-06082002><FONT face=3DTahoma = color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>I=20 have no doubt that you noted that I apologized to those who make a = "positive=20 constribution" to the list. I'm sure the list owner, Jeff Salisbury, = would=20 consider himself in that category and therefore considers himself = aplogized=20 to.</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=3D210001301-06082002><FONT face=3DTahoma = color=3D#0000ff=20 size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=3D210001301-06082002><FONT face=3DTahoma = color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>It=20 seems that you do not consider yourself apologized to, so I presume you = don't=20 see yourself in that category.</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=3D210001301-06082002><FONT face=3DTahoma = color=3D#0000ff=20 size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=3D210001301-06082002><FONT face=3DTahoma = color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>I=20 consider this matter closed. If you wish to persue it further please = contact me=20 off list.</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>Aloha,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma color=3D#0000ff size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>Mike = Gibbons</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>Proactive = Technologies,=20 LLC</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DTahoma color=3D#0000ff=20 size=3D2>http://www.proactech.com</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT = face=3DTahoma=20 size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Donald=20 Wallker<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, August 05, 2002 3:04 PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM]=20 defamation<BR><BR></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have been watching with interest = the gradual=20 unfolding of the defamation issues this forum is trying to deal=20 with. The flat out admissiion in=20 Mike's apology has clearly been motivated by = consultation with=20 an Attorney, or a discussion with someone who has = consulted=20 with an Attorney, familiar with Defamation Law. I = really do=20 not believe what Mike has said has anyhing to do with his character or = true=20 beliefs.. My belief is that the persons Mike should be = publically=20 apologiing to are the persons who have been the most hurt by his = remarks,=20 that is, the person he defamed and the owner of the Canslim = website. The=20 </FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>apology should be made to the = person defamed=20 for obvious reasons. On the other hand , the apology should = be made=20 to the owner of the website. because, due to his review of the = subject=20 matter before it is published he has opened himself=20 up to a libel suit, if brought by the person who has been=20 defamed. I hope this entire matter will soon be brought to = a=20 close, that is, by by putting a stop to this nonsense, since I, for = one, do=20 not want to get involved in litigation, even though I am a retired=20 Attorney who could get involved with a litigtion mattter without = great=20 personal cost. </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C23C93.6CE68160-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: OSTE (was Re: [CANSLIM] Potential canslim candiadate) "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Fw: The Importance of 'M' Lois
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] defamation "Donald Wallker"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] defamation KrisFg@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]