From: "zillagirl" <zillagirl@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 05:49:05 -0700
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend "Dan Forant"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Thanks for that info-I understand that part of the wording says "to the best of my knowledge" so unless someone points a finger, it might be hard to catch. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 6:43 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend > in reviewing Reuters headlines this morning, I noticed that the SEC is now > posting on their website the lists of companies that have complied (at least > technically) with the certification requirement. Of course, doesn't mean > their financial report was honest or accurate, just that the CEO and CFO > certified it as such. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <Spencer48@aol.com> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 11:32 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend > > > Dan: > > I think institutions and retail buyers are not buying because they > don't know how much corruption of books there is. Many say that the > percentage of companies with fraudulent books is relatively small. But so > what. One don't know which company is engaging in fradulent accounting and > which isn't. > > I agree with you that seeing CFOs and CEOs in handcuffs isn't going to > significantly contribute to investor confidence. However, what it does do > (I believe) is deter other CEOs and CFOs from moving over to the dark side. > That's why televising the Wall Street honchos is important. > > Once investors see that the government is serious in enforcing the laws > against fraudulent accounting, the market will be favorably affectd. > > jans > > > In a message dated Sat, 3 Aug 2002 6:43:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, > dforant1@nycap.rr.com writes: > > > This market is more effected by bad earnings and p/e's. The bubble burst a > > long time ago. It's just going to take more quarters to swing the market. > > Notice the newly handcuffed Wall Street perpetrators that didn't rally the > > market recently like the first arrests. I never bought into that. The real > > culprits are, p/e's, and earnings along with the 9/11 disaster that broke > > the camels back. Some say stocks are cheap. Yeah, tech's, > > try em. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend "Dan Forant"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]