From: "Donald Wallker" <dougald@dmv.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] defamation
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:04:01 -0400
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] defamation "Mike Gibbons"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend "Dan Forant"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] defamation "Mike Gibbons"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C23CC3.9FF3CEC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have been watching with interest the gradual unfolding of the = defamation issues this forum is trying to deal with. The flat out = admissiion in Mike's apology has clearly been motivated by consultation = with an Attorney, or a discussion with someone who has consulted with = an Attorney, familiar with Defamation Law. I really do not believe = what Mike has said has anyhing to do with his character or true = beliefs.. My belief is that the persons Mike should be publically = apologiing to are the persons who have been the most hurt by his = remarks, that is, the person he defamed and the owner of the Canslim = website. The apology should be made to the person defamed for obvious = reasons. On the other hand , the apology should be made to the owner of = the website. because, due to his review of the subject matter before it = is published he has opened himself up to a libel suit, if brought by = the person who has been defamed. I hope this entire matter will soon = be brought to a close, that is, by by putting a stop to this nonsense, = since I, for one, do not want to get involved in litigation, even though = I am a retired Attorney who could get involved with a litigtion mattter = without great personal cost. =20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C23CC3.9FF3CEC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have been watching with interest the = gradual=20 unfolding of the defamation issues this forum is trying to deal=20 with. The flat out admissiion in = Mike's apology has=20 clearly been motivated by consultation with an Attorney, or a = discussion=20 with someone who has consulted with an = Attorney, familiar with=20 Defamation Law. I really do not believe what Mike has said = has=20 anyhing to do with his character or true beliefs.. My belief is = that the=20 persons Mike should be publically apologiing to are the persons who have = been=20 the most hurt by his remarks, that is, the person he = defamed and the=20 owner of the Canslim website. The </FONT><FONT face=3DArial = size=3D2>apology should=20 be made to the person defamed for obvious reasons. On the other = hand=20 , the apology should be made to the owner of the = website. because, due=20 to his review of the subject matter before it is published he=20 has opened himself up to a libel suit, if brought by the = person=20 who has been defamed. I hope this entire matter will soon be = brought=20 to a close, that is, by by putting a stop to this nonsense, since I, for = one, do=20 not want to get involved in litigation, even though I am a retired=20 Attorney who could get involved with a litigtion mattter without = great=20 personal cost. </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C23CC3.9FF3CEC0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] defamation "Mike Gibbons"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Market trend "Dan Forant"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] defamation "Mike Gibbons"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]