From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 10:30:43 -0600
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions "Ann"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
I don't know this for sure, but I think you might be referring to an article where the IBD pulled out an example of a stock that blasted off from a cup pattern without first forming a handle and said that not all stocks form a handle. This is the sort of thing that IBD does that I find a little questionable ( and Duke has been good at pointing this stuff out), and that is to do an after the fact analysis and justify it on shaky grounds. If a stock spiked up from a cup with no handle and then failed, I could easily see IBD saying -see, no handle, this is the sort of thing you have to watch out for, this stock should not have been bought. So I think the easy answer is that if it doesn't form a handle and takes off, let it go, wiat for the next one, you don't have to catch everything, look for the sounder pattern. On 7 Aug 2002 at 12:14, Ann wrote: > Maybe I didn't form my question right. How do I know, as the cup forms its > right side and approaches the previous high, whether it's going to be a cup > with a handle or without a handle? What if I am waiting for a handle to > form, but it doesn't form and goes straight to breaking out? Then it has > formed a cup-without-handle, but I have missed the breakout. Or do you just > have to be there at the time it is breaking out or catch it within 5%? - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions "Ann"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]