Re: [CANSLIM] BLUD -- LLUR candidate?

From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] BLUD -- LLUR candidate?
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 22:38:35 -0400

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions "Norman"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Warren, I think I have noted BLUD as a LLUR several times in my WWW column,
but never dug into any due diligence on it. The issues you cite are ones
that should be resolved before anyone gets serious about it, esp in this
market, because they could blow up without notice. I do think they have had
some non recurring charges that may affect the ROE calculation. I like their
sequential growth both top and bottom line.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren Keuffel" <wkeuffel@xmission.com>
To: "CANSLIM list" <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 12:00 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] BLUD -- LLUR candidate?

Whatcha think of BLUD? Seems to be almost immune (bad pun on the co.
name) to the downdrafts in the M market.

Of course, little things -- like a -41% ROE, a LT debt/equity ratio
450+% higher than the rest of its industry -- might make some people
queasy. <g>

Warren

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.