Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS Oath

From: "NANCY POLCARO" <zillagirl@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS Oath
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 17:39:48 -0700
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] ENR michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Stocks for a watchlist - Kris/Nancy l KrisFg@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
Winston-this is Nancy-I have been gone so I hope this post is still related. 
  YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT in your view of my request.  I would learn 
nothing by people saying buy this or buy that.  I can get a stock broker to 
lose my money for me that way( and did as a matter of fact.)  You, I think 
have worded it better then myself. REAL TIME!     For example- It caught my 
eye because of this-I scanned it using this-The chart did this today and 
that might mean this, lets see what happens in a day or week as we follow 
it.  I think that would help me so much. If you would consider working like 
that with me I would love it and would welcome every one else's input also.  
I don't even care if the stock is on anyone's watch list.  I can learn just 
as much from following any stock(It just may not be a Canslim stock grade 
wise, ect.) but if you don't mind I would be very grateful.  Gene is also 
trying to help by leading us through the process.  At least I think he is 
going to allow me to participate but have not had a chance to read all my 
emails yet.  If not I will do the work anyway.  Please let me know what you 
think. Thank You Nancy  P.S. Maybe we could follow one of the stocks that 
Gene recommended.  I hope it would not take to much time daily once we start 
to look at the cahrts.


>From: "Winston Little" <wlittle1@peoplepc.com>
>Reply-To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS Oath
>Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:41:37 -0400
>
>MessageKatherine:
>You are correct on the path of the discussion.
>It  has taken several twists, and turns.
>The purpose of my note was not in reference to your weekly list.
>
>The cases studies presented in the O'Neil books and IBD Investors Corner 
>are compiled with the benefit of 100% of hindsight on what the correct 
>assessment and decisions should have been.
>As I read the notes with "requests for help", my understanding of them is 
>that people were asking for discussion of a current case where the outcome 
>is still unknown, and the requester could PARTICIPATE in the discussion and 
>track the outcome.
>Discussion and analysis of current cases also may also be more meaningful 
>and interesting, as the tone and speed of the market moves has changed from 
>those presented in the books and IBD Investors Corner, since there is no 
>hindsight available.
>
>At times some of the requests loosely used the term "lists of stocks" or 
>"list of potential  candidates", which has lead to objections or 
>rejections.
>My recollection of the posts were that some respondents interpreted the 
>requests as the requester asking for the analysis work to be done by 
>someone else.
>My belief is that was not the goal of the people asking for the help.
>
>My intent was NOT to in any way imply that you were saying:   "that I was 
>implying that I didn't want to "do the work for others".
>The purpose of this note and my previous ones were not to advocate the 
>keeping of any lists other than the ones that each person chose to develop.
>Instead it was to try to allow anyone to identify a stock, give some 
>technical and fundamental information about it and then and only then ASK a 
>specific question on some aspect of the situation as it related to CANSLIM, 
>and then to PARTICIPATE in any resulting  discussion.
>
>I hope that this clarifies the status, and again my intent was not to 
>offend you in any way, or to imply that you were unwilling to assist 
>anyone.
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Katherine Malm
>   To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>   Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 12:31 PM
>   Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS Oath
>
>
>   Winston,
>
>   I'm a little confused now....maybe it's because the thread became so 
>convoluted. Are you saying that I was implying that I didn't want to "do 
>the work for others" when I said that I did not want to post a weekly list? 
>If so, that was never my intent. My original comment was simply that *any* 
>list is a "crutch" (including those generated by the IBD)  because it 
>doesn't allow the user to find a personal path to creating their own list 
>of candidates. The problem is not with having a list, the problem is with 
>having *too many* lists and no means to sift through them in a meaningful 
>way.
>
>   For me personally, I knew that my mining methods were working well when 
>I was already stalking trades *before* the stocks were highlighted in the 
>IBD. The process of arriving at that particular mining method gave me an 
>expanded understanding and confidence in the CANSLIM discipline. As Robert 
>E stated so eloquently earlier today in his oh-so-Zen post.....the trip is 
>the destination.
>
>   Katherine
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Winston Little
>   To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>   Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 10:57 AM
>   Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS Oath
>
>
>   Duke:
>
>   We believe that Martha Stewart (not McCallum) will be available to 
>administer the oath for you.
>
>   My perception from watching the correspondence on the subject is that 
>most if not all supplicants have read one or more of  the books and were 
>seeking some forum for tracking a case while it was live.
>
>   The O'Neil books and IBD are filled with after the fact case studies and 
>Monday morning quarterbacking.These are helpful, and the WebLink feature 
>has served to improve the status with cases more current.
>   Unfortunately, I believe that several people have read the requests as 
>people asking for others to do the work for the requesters rather than for  
>help with more current cases.
>
>
>
>
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: Duke Miller
>     To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>     Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 11:34 AM
>     Subject: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS Oath
>
>
>     Charley, you the man!
>
>     And Jeff, if you're listening, how's this for a "what-if"?  Just as 
>CEO's are signing off on their companies' earnings, what if new members 
>sign off on having read at least one of O'Neil's books?  A simple statement 
>would do:
>
>     "It is understood by all of the present members that you (as a new 
>member) are versed in the CANSLIM methodology and that you have read  at 
>least one of WON's books."
>
>     I don't make this suggestion lightly, Jeff: I'll volunteer to appear 
>before the cameras on CNBC as the first member to sign this oath!  
>(Provided, of course, Maria B. does the interview!)
>
>     Duke
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com 
>[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com
>       Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 7:16 PM
>       To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>       Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Hunting List (nee Watchlist) - Holy Tomatoes
>
>
>       Kris: There certainly nothing wrong with lurking, but may I offer a 
>suggestion? You have not said if you have read O'Neil's two books How to 
>Make Money in Stocks and 24 Essential Lessons for Investment Success. This 
>is how most of us got started. The problem I had after I read the books was 
>that there was no place to go to ask questions. This forum fills that need. 
>I have found that most participants are willing to share their knowledge.
>       Good Luck       Charley




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.