RE: [CANSLIM] Current Case Study - XRAY


From: Fanus <fanus13@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Current Case Study - XRAY
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 22:03:57 -0700 (PDT)

Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] archives "Lin Wells"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Hermann he just meant this is a very good format of
presenting the stock. This is just an expression and
don't need to be dissected to the finest detail.

- - Fanus

- --- Hermann Ertl <hertl@attglobal.net> wrote:
> That is a good point, Duke. Don't use simple
> language if a more
> complicated expression, that adds value to the
> information,
> can be found.
> 
> I thought you spoke about XRAY when you said, "crème
> de la crème!"
> and I would have liked that you explain what -
> actually that is
> not the right word because superlative means
> everything - why it
> is superlative.
> 
> Now I am not sure. Did you say Mike belongs to the
> highest
> social class?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 23:07:35 -0400
> >
> > Hermann:
> >
> > 1.  Something superlative.
> > 2.  People of the highest social level.
> >
> > [French : crème, cream + de, of + la, the + crème,
> cream.]
> >
> >
> >
>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On
> Behalf Of Hermann Ertl
> > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 9:20 PM
> > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Current Case Study - XRAY
> >
> >
> > crème de la crème  -  would you please elaborate.
> >
> >
> >
> > > From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:25:32 -0400
> > >
> > >    e  Mike:   When it comes to submitting 
> stocks for
> > > consideration, this has got to be, beyond a
> doubt, the crème de la
> > > crème!
> > >
> > >         -----Original    Message-----
> > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On
> Behalf Of Mike Gibbons
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 3:27 PM
> > > To:    canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > > Subject: [CANSLIM] Current Case Study -    XRAY
> > >
> > >    In    view of the interest in current cases
> rather than 20-20
> > > hindsight,  and discussions to aid the   
> learning process,  I offer
> > > XRAY as an example, which    broke out today
> from a CwH pattern with
> > > short handle       Firstly, let me add the
> disclaimer that I'm a
> > > programmer who was introduced to CANSLIM as a
> development project,
> > > and I'm 1    year into the 3 yr learning curve,
> so further comment
> > > by the "experts" is    welcomed to improve my
> own
> > > understanding.       Firstly the fundamentals
> which are very strong,
> > > with the    exception that Institutional
> Ownership is already quite
> > > high. There are    differing views on what the
> level should be, but
> > > somewhere less than 30% would    be better.
> Additional DD would be
> > > required to determine why    pre-tax profit
> margins are decreasing
> > > and if that is cause for    concern. (This
> information is drawn from
> > > yahoo/multex not    IBD)
> > > C                Current Earnings        >      
>  Earnings per share
> > > growth of at least 25%          in the most
> recent quarter
> > > >
> > >
> > > Most recent quarter year on year growth.        
>  (Published
> > > financial data).
> > >
> > >        35.00 %              >        Latest
> three quarters of sales
> > > growth          should be a minimum of 25%      
>  >        Average
> > > year on year growth for last 3         
> quarters. (Published
> > > financial data).       51.00 %              >   
>     Sales growth
> > > should be accelerating.                  >      
>  Difference in year
> > > on year growth rates          over last 3
> quarters. (Published
> > > financial data).        23.00             A     
>           Strong
> > > Annual Earnings        Growth               
> Annual earnings growth
> > > for the last three          years of 25% or
> greater                3
> > > year compound EPS growth rate. (Published       
>   financial
> > > data).       53.00 %                      Return
> on equity should be
> > > at least          17%                Published
> financial data.
> > > 21.00 %                     Pretax profit
> margins should
> > > be          increasing                Profit
> Margin for most recent
> > > quarter minus          profit margin 1 year ago.
> (Published
> > > financial data).       -1.00                  
> size=2>N
> > > >        New Products, Services or Leadership   
>      >        If a
> > > company has a dynamic new product or         
> service, or is
> > > capitalizing on new conditions in the economy,
> this can
> > > have a dramatic impact on the price of a stock.
> Buy stocks just as
> > > they          emerge from a sound "base" pattern
> and make new price
> > > highs.                 Not Known
> > > size=2>S                Supply and Demand       
>          Watch the
> > > demand for shares by looking at          the
> percentage change in
> > > volume for each of your stocks. Analyze a       
>   stock's daily and
> > > weekly price and volume changes.                
> The up/down volume
> > > ratio measures the ratio          of
> accumulation days to
> > > distribution days over the last 50         
> days.
> > > 0.90             L                Leading Stocks
> in Leading Industry
> > > Groups                          Nearly 50% of a
> stock's price action
> > > is a          result of its industry group's
> performance. Focus on
> > > the top industry          groups, and within
> those groups select
> > > stocks with the best price          performance.
> > > Multex Industry Rank ( 0 - 99 )
> > > (26 week          relative performance).
> > > 90
> > >
> > > Multex Rank within Industry ( 0 - 99 ).         
> Provided for
> > > informational purposes only.
> > > (4 week relative          performance)
> > >
> > >        22              >        The stock's
> Relative Price Strength
> > > Rating          should be in the 80s or 90s     
>    >        We
> > > calculate RS daily by ranking all NYSE,         
> AMEX and NASDAQ
> > > stocks. Our RS algorithm is described         
> here. It correlates
> > > well with IBD's. Value.          Score pro-rated
> in range
> > > 60-79.       83             I               
> Institutional
> > > Sponsorship                You want at least a
> few of the
> > > better          performing mutual funds owning
> the stock. They're
> > > the ones who will          drive the stock up on
> a sustained
> > > basis.                Institutional Ownership.
> Value in range 5
> > > -          30% needed to score 1.       79.00
> 
=== message truncated ===

> ATTACHMENT part 2 image/gif name=xray.gif_2.gif;
x-mac-type=47494666; x-mac-creator=4A565752



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] archives "Lin Wells"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.