Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Ann" <annholly@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:40:50 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] analysts "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0066_01C24240.8B3F0B20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I agree. Very disconcerting.
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Gene Ricci=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated
Arghhh!=20
Same definition
Same data base
Same company
different numbers!
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Bill Triffet=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated
Either way, it appears that the IBD data paints a prettier picture =
of the
stocks.
-Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Ricci" <genr@swbell.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated
I just had today's update figures for DGO sent to me.
The 3 columns are 8/9 DGO data
8/12 IBD readings 30 minutes ago
8/12 DGO just received today's download
Hi Katherine, I hadn't checked today and after reading your note, I
'thought' I was in error.
However, I just went and checked several stocks:
8/9 8/12 8/12
DGO IBD DGO
AAON 85 86 83
AIR 38 55 32
ABCB 89 90 90
ABM 77 85 75
ABN 58 67 58
ACE 69 86 71
ACMR 92 95 92
AES 24 30 25
AFCE 72 79 74
AFL 92 95 91
The first ten (10) I checked showed different numbers.
My question still stands, which one is better?
Gene
----- Original Message -----
From: Katherine Malm
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better
Hi Gene,
There seems to be conflicting information on this...See DGO's reply =
to my
recent inquiry (7/31) about the very same thing:
Hi Katherine,
Thank you for your recent email to Daily Graphs Online.
I apologize, but the recent additions to our services have not yet =
been
reflected in our Image Maps resource. We plan on making the update =
soon.
TO address your question, I would like to confirm that the Composite =
Rating
you see on our service is the same SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating =
that is
provided by the Investor's Business Daily and investors.com.
Please write back if you have any questions or need assistance.
Best regards,
Dan
Daily Graphs Online
www.dailygraphs.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Gene Ricci
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:06 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better
Let's see, IBD provides an Overall Rating and now DGO provides a =
Composite
Rating. Has anyone determined which one is better?
Gene
The new SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating in Investor's Business Daily =
and
the Stock Checkup Overall Rating found on investors.com are based on
different formulas.
The SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating combines all 5 SmartSelect =
Ratings
into one easy-to-use rating. More weight is placed on EPS and RS
Rating, and the stock's percent off its 52-week high is also =
included in
the formula. Results are then compared to all other companies, and =
each
company is assigned a rating from 1-99 with 99 being the best. This
rating is designed to help you get a quick feel for how a company's
SmartSelect=AE Ratings compare to all other stocks in our database. =
This
is intended to be an additional tool to help you find the stocks =
with
the highest SmartSelect=AE Ratings, quickly and easily.
The Overall Rating in the Stock Checkup is determined by a =
proprietary
formula incorporating all five of the Stock Checkup ratings. These =
are
the Technical Rating, Fundamental Rating, Attractiveness Rating, =
Group's
Technical Rating and Group's Fundamental Rating. The Stock Checkup =
uses
over 30 different variables including all the SmartSelect=AE Ratings =
to
calculate the Overall Rating. When using the Stock Checkup, focus =
not
only on the Overall Rating but all 6 of the Checkup Ratings. Also =
study
how the stock compares to its group within the individual Checkup
Ratings.
-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0066_01C24240.8B3F0B20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I agree. Very disconcerting.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dgenr@swbell.net href=3D"mailto:genr@swbell.net">Gene =
Ricci</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, August 12, 2002 =
8:41=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Which =
One Is=20
Better - Updated</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Arghhh! </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Same definition</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Same data base</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Same company</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">different numbers!</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dbtriffet@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:btriffet@earthlink.net">Bill=20
Triffet</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, August 12, 2002 =
6:58=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Which =
One Is=20
Better - Updated</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Either way, it appears that the IBD data paints a =
prettier=20
picture of the<BR>stocks.<BR><BR>-Bill<BR><BR>----- Original Message =
-----<BR>From: "Gene Ricci" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:genr@swbell.net">genr@swbell.net</A>><BR>To: =
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
><BR>Sent:=20
Monday, August 12, 2002 4:50 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One =
Is=20
Better - Updated<BR><BR><BR>I just had today's update figures for =
DGO sent=20
to me.<BR>The 3 columns are 8/9 DGO data<BR>8/12 IBD readings 30 =
minutes=20
ago<BR>8/12 DGO just received today's download<BR><BR><BR>Hi =
Katherine, I=20
hadn't checked today and after reading your note, I<BR>'thought' I =
was in=20
error.<BR><BR>However, I just went and checked several=20
=
stocks:<BR> &n=
bsp; =20
8/9 8/12 =20
=
8/12<BR>  =
; =20
DGO IBD DGO<BR>AAON =20
85 86 =20
83<BR>AIR =20
38 55 =20
32<BR>ABCB =
89 =20
90 =20
90<BR>ABM =20
77 85 =20
75<BR>ABN =20
58 67 =20
58<BR>ACE =20
69 86 =20
71<BR>ACMR 92 =20
95 =20
92<BR>AES =20
24 30 =20
25<BR>AFCE 72 =20
79 =20
74<BR>AFL =20
92 95 =20
91<BR><BR><BR>The first ten (10) I checked showed different=20
numbers.<BR><BR>My question still stands, which one is=20
better?<BR><BR>Gene<BR><BR><BR><BR>----- Original Message =
- -----<BR>From:=20
Katherine Malm<BR>To: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
<BR>Sent:=20
Monday, August 12, 2002 5:47 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One =
Is=20
Better<BR><BR><BR>Hi Gene,<BR><BR>There seems to be conflicting =
information=20
on this...See DGO's reply to my<BR>recent inquiry (7/31) about the =
very same=20
thing:<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Hi Katherine,<BR><BR>Thank you for your =
recent=20
email to Daily Graphs Online.<BR><BR>I apologize, but the recent =
additions=20
to our services have not yet been<BR>reflected in our Image Maps=20
resource. We plan on making the update soon.<BR>TO address =
your=20
question, I would like to confirm that the Composite Rating<BR>you =
see on=20
our service is the same SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating that =
is<BR>provided by=20
the Investor's Business Daily and investors.com.<BR><BR>Please write =
back if=20
you have any questions or need assistance.<BR><BR>Best=20
regards,<BR>Dan<BR>Daily Graphs Online<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.dailygraphs.com">www.dailygraphs.com</A><BR><BR>----- =
Original Message -----<BR>From: Gene Ricci<BR>To: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
<BR>Sent:=20
Monday, August 12, 2002 4:06 PM<BR>Subject: [CANSLIM] Which One Is=20
Better<BR><BR><BR>Let's see, IBD provides an Overall Rating and now =
DGO=20
provides a Composite<BR>Rating. Has anyone determined which one is=20
better?<BR><BR>Gene<BR><BR>The new SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating =
in=20
Investor's Business Daily and<BR>the Stock Checkup Overall Rating =
found on=20
investors.com are based on<BR>different formulas.<BR><BR>The =
SmartSelect=AE=20
Composite Rating combines all 5 SmartSelect Ratings<BR>into one =
easy-to-use=20
rating. More weight is placed on EPS and RS<BR>Rating, and the =
stock's=20
percent off its 52-week high is also included in<BR>the =
formula. =20
Results are then compared to all other companies, and =
each<BR>company is=20
assigned a rating from 1-99 with 99 being the best. =
This<BR>rating is=20
designed to help you get a quick feel for how a =
company's<BR>SmartSelect=AE=20
Ratings compare to all other stocks in our database. =
This<BR>is=20
intended to be an additional tool to help you find the stocks =
with<BR>the=20
highest SmartSelect=AE Ratings, quickly and easily.<BR><BR>The =
Overall Rating=20
in the Stock Checkup is determined by a proprietary<BR>formula =
incorporating=20
all five of the Stock Checkup ratings. These are<BR>the Technical =
Rating,=20
Fundamental Rating, Attractiveness Rating, Group's<BR>Technical =
Rating and=20
Group's Fundamental Rating. The Stock Checkup uses<BR>over 30=20
different variables including all the SmartSelect=AE Ratings =
to<BR>calculate=20
the Overall Rating. When using the Stock Checkup, focus =
not<BR>only on=20
the Overall Rating but all 6 of the Checkup Ratings. Also =
study<BR>how=20
the stock compares to its group within the individual=20
Checkup<BR>Ratings.<BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, =
email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
the=20
email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim". Do=20
not use quotes in your email.<BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To =
subscribe/unsubscribe,=20
email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
the=20
email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim". Do=20
not use quotes in your =
email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_0066_01C24240.8B3F0B20--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] analysts "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]