[CANSLIM] Re: WTW (was: Which One Is Better - Updated)


From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: WTW (was: Which One Is Better - Updated)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:32:35 -0500

Next Article (by Author): RE: Pearl of Wisdom (was [CANSLIM] CCR - I offer this up for dissection) "Kelly Short"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Hi Mike,

WTW didn't have the smoothest base, but it was a 12 week base nonetheless.
That's not unusual given the gyrations of the market as it's been groping
for this latest bottom. So that you can see my personal take on it, I've
annotated the chart at:

http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/WTW081302.jpg


Gene noted that WTW is also featured in IBD's weblink today. They have also
annotated a chart, so you can see their interpretation at:

http://www.investors.com/weblink/

Katherine

- ----- Original Message -----
From: <michael_niemotka@baxter.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated



Katherine,

Can you expound on the statement that WTW broke out?  In looking at the
chart, I can sorta see a v shaped cwh, but in the handle, the volume did
NOT dry up.....what would you say the pivot point was?

Thanks

Mike Niemotka , PE
Sr. Principal Engineer
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Route 120 & Wilson Road
Round Lake, IL 60073
Tel (847) 270-4075
Fax (847) 270-4525
michael_niemotka@baxter.com



                    "Katherine Malm"
                    <kmalm@earthlink.net>         To:
canslim@lists.xmission.com
                    Sent by:                      cc:
                    owner-canslim@lists.xm        Subject:     Re: [CANSLIM]
Which One Is Better - Updated
                    ission.com


                    08/12/2002 08:02 PM
                    Please respond to
                    canslim






You know, I have a simple solution for this kind of dilemma....don't use
the numbers.

I know it's tempting to use a number like this, as it seems to "tell you
everything" about the stock. But I think once you summarize summary
numbers, you're asking for trouble. I rank the composite score as "mildly
useful."

Here's an example. I'll select a couple of stocks that have come up for
discussion here in the last few months: WTW and TOL.

Scores?
WTW = 96
TOL = 95

Yet, look at the charts. WTW broke out today, TOL is rolling over and
playing dead. Doesn't sound like a score of 95/96 "tells" me everything I
need to know about the stocks.

Katherine
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: Gene Ricci
 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
 Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 7:41 PM
 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated

 Arghhh!
 Same definition
 Same data base
 Same company
 different numbers!
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: Bill Triffet
 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
 Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:58 PM
 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated

 Either way, it appears that the IBD data paints a prettier picture of the
 stocks.

 -Bill

 ----- Original Message -----
 From: "Gene Ricci" <genr@swbell.net>
 To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
 Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:50 PM
 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated


 I just had today's update figures for DGO sent to me.
 The 3 columns are 8/9 DGO data
 8/12 IBD readings 30 minutes ago
 8/12 DGO just received today's download


 Hi Katherine, I hadn't checked today and after reading your note, I
 'thought' I was in error.

 However, I just went and checked several stocks:
                8/9  8/12  8/12
                 DGO  IBD  DGO
 AAON     85     86      83
 AIR          38     55      32
 ABCB       89     90     90
 ABM         77    85      75
 ABN         58    67       58
 ACE         69    86        71
 ACMR     92     95       92
 AES         24     30       25
 AFCE      72     79       74
 AFL         92     95       91


 The first ten (10) I checked showed different numbers.

 My question still stands, which one is better?

 Gene



 ----- Original Message -----
 From: Katherine Malm
 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
 Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:47 PM
 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better


 Hi Gene,

 There seems to be conflicting information on this...See DGO's reply to my
 recent inquiry (7/31) about the very same thing:




 Hi Katherine,

 Thank you for your recent email to Daily Graphs Online.

 I apologize, but the recent additions to our services have not yet been
 reflected in our Image Maps resource.  We plan on making the update soon.
 TO address your question, I would like to confirm that the Composite
 Rating
 you see on our service is the same SmartSelect® Composite Rating that is
 provided by the Investor's Business Daily and investors.com.

 Please write back if you have any questions or need assistance.

 Best regards,
 Dan
 Daily Graphs Online
 www.dailygraphs.com

 ----- Original Message -----
 From: Gene Ricci
 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
 Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:06 PM
 Subject: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better


 Let's see, IBD provides an Overall Rating and now DGO provides a Composite
 Rating. Has anyone determined which one is better?

 Gene

 The new SmartSelect® Composite Rating in Investor's Business Daily and
 the Stock Checkup Overall Rating found on investors.com are based on
 different formulas.

 The SmartSelect® Composite Rating combines all 5 SmartSelect Ratings
 into one easy-to-use rating.  More weight is placed on EPS and RS
 Rating, and the stock's percent off its 52-week high is also included in
 the formula.  Results are then compared to all other companies, and each
 company is assigned a rating from 1-99 with 99 being the best.  This
 rating is designed to help you get a quick feel for how a company's
 SmartSelect® Ratings compare to all other stocks in our database.  This
 is intended to be an additional tool to help you find the stocks with
 the highest SmartSelect® Ratings, quickly and easily.

 The Overall Rating in the Stock Checkup is determined by a proprietary
 formula incorporating all five of the Stock Checkup ratings. These are
 the Technical Rating, Fundamental Rating, Attractiveness Rating, Group's
 Technical Rating and Group's Fundamental Rating.  The Stock Checkup uses
 over 30 different variables including all the SmartSelect® Ratings to
 calculate the Overall Rating.  When using the Stock Checkup, focus not
 only on the Overall Rating but all 6 of the Checkup Ratings.  Also study
 how the stock compares to its group within the individual Checkup
 Ratings.



 -
 -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
 -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
 -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


 -
 -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
 -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
 -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.





- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): RE: Pearl of Wisdom (was [CANSLIM] CCR - I offer this up for dissection) "Kelly Short"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.