Re: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO


From: "Bill Triffet" <btriffet@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:17:16 -0700

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] CECO "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Hear hear! Thanks Katherine - for the excellent links!

- -Bill

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Gibbons" <mike@proactech.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:09 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO


> Lesson for list members: if you really want to learn a subject in depth,
pick a fight with Katherine. You will be treated gently,
> but come away from the experience greatly enlightened. I recommend all the
chart reading neophytes on the list check out all the
> links Katherine provided.
>
> Thank you Katherine for the hand drawn chart and uploading all those
references. I hope you weren't up all night (I see the time on
> the posting was 5:19 am) on my account. As someone else asked recently, do
you ever sleep?
>
> Aloha,
>
> Mike Gibbons
> Proactive Technologies, LLC
> http://www.proactech.com
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm
>   Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 5:19 AM
>   To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>   Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO
>
>
>   HI Mike,
>
>
>
>   I can tell my response wasn't clear. Let me try again with some examples
and articles.
>
>
>
>   In general, it's important to distinguish between a "healthy rising
stock" and a "base." On one hand, you will have a stock, like
> CECO, which has been rising over time. Each time is rises for a while,
then it pauses to consolidate. That pause is the "base." Each
> time the stock reaches a new high and then consolidates, it will
demonstrate its ability to absorb the gains from the previous rise
> of >=25%. That pattern that you see along the rising trend line is what
you want to see in a stock. The problem is, after the stock
> has done this 3 or 4 times, it becomes well-known and obvious, and so it
is rare that it can continue tracing out this same rising
> behavior for too much longer. What will normally happen is that the stock
will often fail in the next breakout and/or correct so
> deeply that it undercuts the low of the previous base. That "resets the
base count" and you then start over with counting bases,
> assuming of course, that the stock *can* recover. WON suggests that if the
correction is more than 80% that the stock is too badly
> damaged that it may not recover in any reasonable time period. (IBM and
WMT come to mind....look back at a 10 year chart of each of
> them and notice what happened after they corrected so deeply. They
essentially went into years of sideways movement.)
>
>
>
>   Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words, so thought it easier to
write up some notes. See notes on the "Healthy Rising
> Stock" at:
>
>   http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/HealthyRisingStock.JPG
>
>
>
>   Now, far different than the healthy rising stock is the *type* of base
that it forms while consolidating. There are many, though
> there are some that are more common, more reliable, and far easier to spot
than others. I'd rank the ascending base as the most
> difficult to master. See my handwritten notes on types of bases at:
>
>   http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/TypesOfBases.JPG
>
>
>
>   Just to be complete, I've also uploaded quite a few resources related to
both rising stocks (base counting) and ascending bases. I
> figured it was far easier to do that than to reinvent the wheel and
describe the ascending base in detail. See them at:
>
>
>
>   Counting bases:
>
>   http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CountingBasesHowTo.doc
>
>   http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/DeepCorrResetBCount.JPG
>
>   http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CountBasesB4Buy.JPG
>
>   http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/MktWashoutNewBases.JPG
>
>
>
>   Ascending bases:
>
>   http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/AscendingBaseRally.JPG
>
>   http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/FindAscendingBases.doc
>
>   http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/BuyPointABase.doc
>
>
>
>   In summary, there is no such thing as a "long term ascending base" as
the concept confuses a healthy rising stock pattern over a
> longer time period with the ascending base pattern, which is a particular
kind of consolidation (>=6wks).
>
>
>
>   CECO has been exhibiting the characteristics of a "healthy rising stock"
and is currently forming a 3rd stage base. CECO is *not*
> currently forming an ascending base. It is forming a very strange base on
base (flat + C&H) as far as I can tell. I saw many odd
> patterns like this at the September '01 low and many of the stocks were
able to recover from the V shaped sell off, breakout and
> move on. Many of the retailers, the gaming stocks, homebuilders, security
related stocks and Aero & Defense come to mind.
>
>
>
>   Katherine
>
>
>
>
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: Mike Gibbons
>     To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>     Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 10:20 PM
>     Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO
>
>
>     Hi Katherine,
>
>     I just opened my brand new copy of HTMMIS v 3 and found on P. 137-138
the topic "Ascending Base". The definition is somewhat
> similar to what you describe:- "Ascending Bases, like flat bases, occur
midway along a move up after a stock has broken out of a
> cup-with-handle or double-bottom base. It has three pullbacks from 10% to
20% with each low point during the sell-of in price being
> higher than the preceding, which is why I call it and ascending base. Each
of the pullbacks usually ocurs due to the general market
> declining at that time."
>
>     Looking at your annotated chart, it would seem CECO fits this
definition. It would also seem that the most recent pullback
> coincided with the July selloff in the markets in agreement with the
definition.
>
>     Maybe CECO is one to watch. Any other views?
>
>     Aloha,
>
>     Mike Gibbons
>     Proactive Technologies, LLC
>     http://www.proactech.com
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm
>       Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 3:52 PM
>       To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>       Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO
>
>
>       HI Mike,
>
>       I've noticed the term "long term ascending base" coming up in many
posts lately, so thought I'd make comment on that concept.
>
>       There's actually no such thing, as "ascending base" is a very
particular kind of conolidation in the stock's move. In general,
> a stock will rise, then pause (base), rise, then pause, rise, then pause,
and so on. As long as the rise between consolidations is
> at least 25%, the next area of consolidation is considered a new stage
base. This is also the same reason that an LLUR is not a
> base....it's a stock on the rise, though with low volatility. (Sorry, Tom,
just a point on which we don't agree.)
>
>       The base normally happens when the stock makes a new high, then
falls and/or refuses to continue the up move for some period
> of time. A flat base for example, moves essentially sideways for at least
5 wks, the C&H or cup without handle lasts for at least 7
> wks and sports a deeper correction as the stock retraces some of the
previous move, etc. The ascending base is just an odd
> consolidation in that it drifts upward, attempting to breakout 3 times.
It's a subtle pattern that's hard to read, but shouldn't be
> confused with a stock that is rising *between* consolidations.
>
>       I've uploaded an example on the CECO chart that shows the base, move
up, base, move up, etc.
>       http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/CECO081202.jpg
>
>       Please note that I marked the chart quickly, so the circled areas
for the base are "general" and not exact for each base
> formation.
>
>       Katherine
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         From: Mike Gibbons
>         To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>         Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 7:54 PM
>         Subject: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO
>
>
>         When I brought up XRAY last week, Winston observed that the longer
term pattern was more like an ascending base. To my
> surprize, the XRAY breakout hasn't failed yet, although it hasn't been
strong either, and may be in the process of forming another
> handle.
>
>         I came across another stock today with similar chart
characteristics to XRAY - now in the handle of a Cwh formation with
> good CANSLIM characteristics
(http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim/fuzzy_canslim.php?symbol=CECO) except for
v. high institutional
> ownership - but the longer term pattern looks like an ascending base.
>
>         The CwH pattern is not ideal with the cup too short and V-shaped,
which I attribute to the market behavior in July, but
> perhaps its on its way to resuming the long term ascending base pattern.
>
>         Comments anyone?
>
>         Aloha,
>
>         Mike Gibbons
>         Proactive Technologies, LLC
>         http://www.proactech.com
>
>


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] CECO "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.