Re: [CANSLIM] Re: WTW (was: Which One Is Better - Updated)


From: "NANCY POLCARO" <ZILLAGIRL@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: WTW (was: Which One Is Better - Updated)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:06:20 -0700

Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Re:Entry purchase E2moskow@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions "NANCY POLCARO"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


- ------=_NextPart_001_0002_01C242FC.82212FC0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can you explain something for me?  On the IBD wtw chart points 2 and 3.  =
I would have seen volumn dropping and the stock moving sideway and though=
t it was about to take a dive.  Instead, in this chart they said it was g=
ood action.  Am I wrong?  I know in hindsite I can see what the chart did=
, but not as it happened.   Also it's  group is D, its got an acc/dist. o=
f D and its 5 of the top 5 stocks.  Would this keep you from entering eve=
n though it has a breakout on high volumn?  =20
 =20
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Katherine Malm
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 7:33 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: WTW (was: Which One Is Better - Updated)
 =20
Hi Mike,

WTW didn't have the smoothest base, but it was a 12 week base nonetheless=
.
That's not unusual given the gyrations of the market as it's been groping
for this latest bottom. So that you can see my personal take on it, I've
annotated the chart at:

http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/WTW081302.jpg


Gene noted that WTW is also featured in IBD's weblink today. They have al=
so
annotated a chart, so you can see their interpretation at:

http://www.investors.com/weblink/

Katherine

- ----- Original Message -----
From: <michael_niemotka@baxter.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated



Katherine,

Can you expound on the statement that WTW broke out?  In looking at the
chart, I can sorta see a v shaped cwh, but in the handle, the volume did
NOT dry up.....what would you say the pivot point was?

Thanks

Mike Niemotka , PE
Sr. Principal Engineer
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Route 120 & Wilson Road
Round Lake, IL 60073
Tel (847) 270-4075
Fax (847) 270-4525
michael_niemotka@baxter.com



                    "Katherine Malm"
                    <kmalm@earthlink.net>         To:
canslim@lists.xmission.com
                    Sent by:                      cc:
                    owner-canslim@lists.xm        Subject:     Re: [CANSL=
IM]
Which One Is Better - Updated
                    ission.com


                    08/12/2002 08:02 PM
                    Please respond to
                    canslim






You know, I have a simple solution for this kind of dilemma....don't use
the numbers.

I know it's tempting to use a number like this, as it seems to "tell you
everything" about the stock. But I think once you summarize summary
numbers, you're asking for trouble. I rank the composite score as "mildly
useful."

Here's an example. I'll select a couple of stocks that have come up for
discussion here in the last few months: WTW and TOL.

Scores?
WTW =3D 96
TOL =3D 95

Yet, look at the charts. WTW broke out today, TOL is rolling over and
playing dead. Doesn't sound like a score of 95/96 "tells" me everything I
need to know about the stocks.

Katherine
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Gene Ricci
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated

Arghhh!
Same definition
Same data base
Same company
different numbers!
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Triffet
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated

Either way, it appears that the IBD data paints a prettier picture of the
stocks.

- -Bill

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Ricci" <genr@swbell.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated


I just had today's update figures for DGO sent to me.
The 3 columns are 8/9 DGO data
8/12 IBD readings 30 minutes ago
8/12 DGO just received today's download


Hi Katherine, I hadn't checked today and after reading your note, I
'thought' I was in error.

However, I just went and checked several stocks:
                8/9  8/12  8/12
                 DGO  IBD  DGO
AAON     85     86      83
AIR          38     55      32
ABCB       89     90     90
ABM         77    85      75
ABN         58    67       58
ACE         69    86        71
ACMR     92     95       92
AES         24     30       25
AFCE      72     79       74
AFL         92     95       91


The first ten (10) I checked showed different numbers.

My question still stands, which one is better?

Gene



- ----- Original Message -----
From: Katherine Malm
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better


Hi Gene,

There seems to be conflicting information on this...See DGO's reply to my
recent inquiry (7/31) about the very same thing:




Hi Katherine,

Thank you for your recent email to Daily Graphs Online.

I apologize, but the recent additions to our services have not yet been
reflected in our Image Maps resource.  We plan on making the update soon.
TO address your question, I would like to confirm that the Composite
Rating
you see on our service is the same SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating that i=
s
provided by the Investor's Business Daily and investors.com.

Please write back if you have any questions or need assistance.

Best regards,
Dan
Daily Graphs Online
www.dailygraphs.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Gene Ricci
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:06 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better


Let's see, IBD provides an Overall Rating and now DGO provides a Composit=
e
Rating. Has anyone determined which one is better?

Gene

The new SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating in Investor's Business Daily and
the Stock Checkup Overall Rating found on investors.com are based on
different formulas.

The SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating combines all 5 SmartSelect Ratings
into one easy-to-use rating.  More weight is placed on EPS and RS
Rating, and the stock's percent off its 52-week high is also included in
the formula.  Results are then compared to all other companies, and each
company is assigned a rating from 1-99 with 99 being the best.  This
rating is designed to help you get a quick feel for how a company's
SmartSelect=AE Ratings compare to all other stocks in our database.  This
is intended to be an additional tool to help you find the stocks with
the highest SmartSelect=AE Ratings, quickly and easily.

The Overall Rating in the Stock Checkup is determined by a proprietary
formula incorporating all five of the Stock Checkup ratings. These are
the Technical Rating, Fundamental Rating, Attractiveness Rating, Group's
Technical Rating and Group's Fundamental Rating.  The Stock Checkup uses
over 30 different variables including all the SmartSelect=AE Ratings to
calculate the Overall Rating.  When using the Stock Checkup, focus not
only on the Overall Rating but all 6 of the Checkup Ratings.  Also study
how the stock compares to its group within the individual Checkup
Ratings.



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.





- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

- ------=_NextPart_001_0002_01C242FC.82212FC0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><BODY STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana; border:none;"><DIV>Can you explai=
n something for me?&nbsp; On the IBD wtw chart points 2 and 3.&nbsp; I wo=
uld have seen volumn dropping and the stock moving sideway and thought it=
 was about to take a dive.&nbsp; Instead, in this chart they said it was =
good action.&nbsp; Am I wrong?&nbsp; I know in hindsite I can see what th=
e chart did, but not as it happened.&nbsp;&nbsp; Also it's &nbsp;group&nb=
sp;is D, its got an acc/dist. of D and its 5 of the top 5 stocks.&nbsp; W=
ould this keep you from entering even though it has a breakout on high vo=
lumn?&nbsp;&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-RI=
GHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px s=
olid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Original =
Message -----</DIV> <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt Arial; =
COLOR: black"><B>From:</B> Katherine Malm</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt =
Arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, August 13, 2002 7:33 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"=
FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>To:</B> canslim@lists.xmission.com</DIV> <DIV style=3D=
"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Re: WTW (was: Which One Is B=
etter - Updated)</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>Hi Mike,<BR><BR>WTW didn't have t=
he smoothest base, but it was a 12 week base nonetheless.<BR>That's not u=
nusual given the gyrations of the market as it's been groping<BR>for this=
 latest bottom. So that you can see my personal take on it, I've<BR>annot=
ated the chart at:<BR><BR>http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/WTW081302.jpg=
<BR><BR><BR>Gene noted that WTW is also featured in IBD's weblink today. =
They have also<BR>annotated a chart, so you can see their interpretation =
at:<BR><BR>http://www.investors.com/weblink/<BR><BR>Katherine<BR><BR>----=
- - Original Message -----<BR>From: &lt;michael_niemotka@baxter.com&gt;<BR>=
To: &lt;canslim@lists.xmission.com&gt;<BR>Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 =
8:50 AM<BR>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated<BR><BR><B=
R><BR>Katherine,<BR><BR>Can you expound on the statement that WTW broke o=
ut?&nbsp; In looking at the<BR>chart, I can sorta see a v shaped cwh, but=
 in the handle, the volume did<BR>NOT dry up.....what would you say the p=
ivot point was?<BR><BR>Thanks<BR><BR>Mike Niemotka , PE<BR>Sr. Principal =
Engineer<BR>Baxter Healthcare Corporation<BR>Route 120 &amp; Wilson Road<=
BR>Round Lake, IL 60073<BR>Tel (847) 270-4075<BR>Fax (847) 270-4525<BR>mi=
chael_niemotka@baxter.com<BR><BR><BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb=
sp;&nbsp; "Katherine Malm"<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&=
nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &=
lt;kmalm@earthlink.net&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp=
; To:<BR>canslim@lists.xmission.com<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp=
;&nbsp; Sent by:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb=
sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; cc:=
<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb=
sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; owner-canslim@lists.xm&nbsp=
;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Subject:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Re=
: [CANSLIM]<BR>Which One Is Better - Updated<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&=
nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ission.com<BR><BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp=
;&nbsp; 08/12/2002 08:02 PM<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
Please respond to<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; canslim<BR=
><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>You know, I have a simple solution for this kind=
 of dilemma....don't use<BR>the numbers.<BR><BR>I know it's tempting to u=
se a number like this, as it seems to "tell you<BR>everything" about the =
stock. But I think once you summarize summary<BR>numbers, you're asking f=
or trouble. I rank the composite score as "mildly<BR>useful."<BR><BR>Here=
's an example. I'll select a couple of stocks that have come up for<BR>di=
scussion here in the last few months: WTW and TOL.<BR><BR>Scores?<BR>WTW =
=3D 96<BR>TOL =3D 95<BR><BR>Yet, look at the charts. WTW broke out today,=
 TOL is rolling over and<BR>playing dead. Doesn't sound like a score of 9=
5/96 "tells" me everything I<BR>need to know about the stocks.<BR><BR>Kat=
herine<BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: Gene Ricci<BR>To: canslim=
@lists.xmission.com<BR>Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 7:41 PM<BR>Subject: =
Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated<BR><BR>Arghhh!<BR>Same defini=
tion<BR>Same data base<BR>Same company<BR>different numbers!<BR>----- Ori=
ginal Message -----<BR>From: Bill Triffet<BR>To: canslim@lists.xmission.c=
om<BR>Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:58 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Whi=
ch One Is Better - Updated<BR><BR>Either way, it appears that the IBD dat=
a paints a prettier picture of the<BR>stocks.<BR><BR>-Bill<BR><BR>----- O=
riginal Message -----<BR>From: "Gene Ricci" &lt;genr@swbell.net&gt;<BR>To=
: &lt;canslim@lists.xmission.com&gt;<BR>Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:5=
0 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better - Updated<BR><BR><BR>I=
 just had today's update figures for DGO sent to me.<BR>The 3 columns are=
 8/9 DGO data<BR>8/12 IBD readings 30 minutes ago<BR>8/12 DGO just receiv=
ed today's download<BR><BR><BR>Hi Katherine, I hadn't checked today and a=
fter reading your note, I<BR>'thought' I was in error.<BR><BR>However, I =
just went and checked several stocks:<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 8/9&nbsp; 8/12=
&nbsp; 8/12<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; DGO&nbsp; IBD&nbsp; DGO<BR>AAON&nb=
sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 85&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 86&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp; 83<BR>AIR&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
38&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 55&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 32<BR>ABCB&nb=
sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 89&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 90&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp; 90<BR>ABM&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
77&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 85&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 75<BR>ABN&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 58&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 67&nbsp;&nbsp=
;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 58<BR>ACE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp; 69&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 86&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb=
sp; 71<BR>ACMR&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 92&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 95&nbsp=
;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 92<BR>AES&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 24&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 30&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb=
sp;&nbsp; 25<BR>AFCE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 72&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp; 79&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 74<BR>AFL&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 92&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 95&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb=
sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 91<BR><BR><BR>The first ten (10) I checked showed d=
ifferent numbers.<BR><BR>My question still stands, which one is better?<B=
R><BR>Gene<BR><BR><BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: Katherine=
 Malm<BR>To: canslim@lists.xmission.com<BR>Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 =
5:47 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better<BR><BR><BR>Hi Gene,=
<BR><BR>There seems to be conflicting information on this...See DGO's rep=
ly to my<BR>recent inquiry (7/31) about the very same thing:<BR><BR><BR><=
BR><BR>Hi Katherine,<BR><BR>Thank you for your recent email to Daily Grap=
hs Online.<BR><BR>I apologize, but the recent additions to our services h=
ave not yet been<BR>reflected in our Image Maps resource.&nbsp; We plan o=
n making the update soon.<BR>TO address your question, I would like to co=
nfirm that the Composite<BR>Rating<BR>you see on our service is the same =
SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating that is<BR>provided by the Investor's Bus=
iness Daily and investors.com.<BR><BR>Please write back if you have any q=
uestions or need assistance.<BR><BR>Best regards,<BR>Dan<BR>Daily Graphs =
Online<BR>www.dailygraphs.com<BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From=
: Gene Ricci<BR>To: canslim@lists.xmission.com<BR>Sent: Monday, August 12=
, 2002 4:06 PM<BR>Subject: [CANSLIM] Which One Is Better<BR><BR><BR>Let's=
 see, IBD provides an Overall Rating and now DGO provides a Composite<BR>=
Rating. Has anyone determined which one is better?<BR><BR>Gene<BR><BR>The=
 new SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating in Investor's Business Daily and<BR>=
the Stock Checkup Overall Rating found on investors.com are based on<BR>d=
ifferent formulas.<BR><BR>The SmartSelect=AE Composite Rating combines al=
l 5 SmartSelect Ratings<BR>into one easy-to-use rating.&nbsp; More weight=
 is placed on EPS and RS<BR>Rating, and the stock's percent off its 52-we=
ek high is also included in<BR>the formula.&nbsp; Results are then compar=
ed to all other companies, and each<BR>company is assigned a rating from =
1-99 with 99 being the best.&nbsp; This<BR>rating is designed to help you=
 get a quick feel for how a company's<BR>SmartSelect=AE Ratings compare t=
o all other stocks in our database.&nbsp; This<BR>is intended to be an ad=
ditional tool to help you find the stocks with<BR>the highest SmartSelect=
=AE Ratings, quickly and easily.<BR><BR>The Overall Rating in the Stock C=
heckup is determined by a proprietary<BR>formula incorporating all five o=
f the Stock Checkup ratings. These are<BR>the Technical Rating, Fundament=
al Rating, Attractiveness Rating, Group's<BR>Technical Rating and Group's=
 Fundamental Rating.&nbsp; The Stock Checkup uses<BR>over 30 different va=
riables including all the SmartSelect=AE Ratings to<BR>calculate the Over=
all Rating.&nbsp; When using the Stock Checkup, focus not<BR>only on the =
Overall Rating but all 6 of the Checkup Ratings.&nbsp; Also study<BR>how =
the stock compares to its group within the individual Checkup<BR>Ratings.=
<BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission=
.com"<BR>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscrib=
e canslim".&nbsp; Do not use quotes in your email.<BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To su=
bscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"<BR>-In the email body=
, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe canslim".&nbsp; Do not us=
e quotes in your email.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubsc=
ribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"<BR>-In the email body, write "subscr=
ibe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe canslim".&nbsp; Do not use quotes in you=
r email.<BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmis=
sion.com"<BR>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubs=
cribe canslim".&nbsp; Do not use quotes in your email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></=
BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_001_0002_01C242FC.82212FC0--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Re:Entry purchase E2moskow@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] cup-without-handle; "tightness" questions "NANCY POLCARO"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.