Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle

From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:54:04 -0400

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle Chazmoore@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle "John Calkins"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle "John Calkins"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle Chazmoore@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

John, personally I prefer a wedging handle like this to a declining one
(which WON prefers). I note it did something similar with the c&h formed
from early Sept '01 to early Jan '02.

Nice pick, with very nice earnings forecasts

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "John Calkins" <jcalkins@olypen.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 12:34 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle


Hay you guys!  Get a handle on this one for me.

Coinstar (CSTR) turned up as a cup with handle.  Does there need to be a
downward slant to the bottom lows in the handle to make a better handle?  I
see that the upper daily prices are slanting downward, but the lower daily
prices creates a bit of a wedging pattern, any thought on this?  Also I
don't really see much of a dry up in volume in the bottom of the ups base.

(JC)


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Mandatory CEO/CFO certifications deadline


> Hi Tom,
>
> Not sure where the discrepancies coming from, but Briefing.com was
tracking
> the progress on this all day. Here is the day's final report:
>
>       20:19 ET   The final 6
>      We count only 6 companies that did not appear to make the deadline
for
> certifying results: RKY, GMST, HUBG, BPOP, PRU, and ZION (USAI, SRP, SON,
> and ALK were removed from this list). We would caution against
overreacting
> to this list, as it is possible that certifications did arrive at the SEC
> but did not get filed at this time, or that the companies might have asked
> for a 5 day extension.
>
>
> Note that they were counting only non-bankrupt companies.
>
> Katherine
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
> To: "CANSLIM" <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:12 PM
> Subject: [CANSLIM] Mandatory CEO/CFO certifications deadline
>
>
> | The SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/rules/extra/ceocfo.htm makes for
> | interesting reading tonight, for what is not there.  While there are
about
> | 200 companies whose fiscal year means they did not have to report by
this
> | evening, the website still shows (updated at 10 PM) a lot of big names
> that
> | were expected to report by now, and haven't.  I am not even thru the
"A"s
> | yet, and already see Abbot Labs and AOL, among others.
> |
> | A lot of energy companies still haven't reported, probably the next
> industry
> | sector to get racked by scandals, restatements, etc. (like it hasn't
> | already, but could get worse).
> |
> | Bank of NY leads off the "B"s, followed by Bristol Myers. Caterpillar
(in
> | the DOW 30) and Chas Schwab headline the "C"s, along with Coca Cola
(also
> in
> | the DOW). General Dynamics pops up in the "G"s, and has good company
with
> GM
> | (3rd one I saw in the DOW 30, 10% ain't good) and I don't know if I have
> the
> | stomach to keep reading. Knew I should have stopped, IBM pops up in the
> "I"s
> | (4 for the DOW), followed by Kellogg, and Metlife. TRW and UPS finally
> round
> | out the list.
> |
> | I just hope a lot of these "blue chip", reputable companies just filed
too
> | late to have it show on the site, but a 10 PM update seems late enough
to
> | pick up anyone filing by the 5:30 deadline. Any hope the SEC got their
> | deadlines wrong? Maybe they "just forgot"?? If the non-filers are
punished
> | tomorrow for not filing, it looks to be pretty bloody. Anyone trying to
> | understand an otherwise inexplicable drop tomorrow in a particular stock
> may
> | want to check on the filing status. I found that right clicking on the
> list
> | allowed me to export it to Excel, where I could sort on the deadline and
> | next columns, and find the non filers quite easily for review.
> |
> | In all, 238 companies (including, of course the "no surprise" no shows
> like
> | Enron and Conseco and Worldcom and Qwest and US Airways) that were
> expected
> | to file by today still do not show on the SEC list.
> |
> | Tom Worley
> | stkguru@bellsouth.net
> | AIM: TexWorley
> |
> |
> |
> | -
> | -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> | -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> | -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.




- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.