Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH


From: "Ann" <annholly@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:04:07 -0400

Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Coinstar CSTR Chazmoore@aol.com
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH "Ann"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] UCBH "Edward McDonough"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0051_01C2445C.3D110200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0052_01C2445C.3D110200"


- ------=_NextPart_001_0052_01C2445C.3D110200
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for checking on this, Gene.  This list is amazing.

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Gene Ricci=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:25 AM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH


  Ann, my data source shows growth at 18, not too shabby for a bank...

  Charley... I'm awaiting a definitive answer from IBD on institutional =
ownership. I've asked them what they count and what they don't count =
because of the significant differences in the 'numbers' from different =
data suppliers.  My second question to them is 'why aren't banks and =
pension funds, etc. counted in their numbers.=20

  In the Q&A below, IBD switches between calling it institutional =
ownership and mutual funds... if a bank isn't an institution why doesn't =
IBD just call it funds?=20


        What is a level of institutional ownership you consider when =
buying a stock? If too many shares are already owned by institutional =
investors, can that hurt a stock's chances of rising?=20
      =20
          Answer=20
          It is hard to tell how much institutional ownership is too =
much. Therefore, you should place less weight on this factor. Rather, =
focus on the quality of ownership. You want to see at least a few of the =
better performing mutual funds owning the stock you are considering =
buying. In some cases, however, if too many shares are owned by =
institutional investors, this could be bad. That's because it represents =
large potential selling if anything goes wrong with the company or the =
general market.
      =20


    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Chazmoore@aol.com=20
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:58 AM
    Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH


    Ann: I will give you my thoughts to get you started.=20
    Fundamentally, the stock looks sound. You say they lost a fraud suit =
but for the time being the market has not reacted negatively. You didn't =
say when, but if it wasn't yesterday, I wouldn't put much weight on it. =
The market tends to respond very quickly to negative news.=20
    You didn't state your investment goals, but in my opinion this is =
not a growth stock. For one thing if institutions own 91% now, there =
simply isn't enough stock available to new buyers to move the price =
significantly. That does not mean they cannot enjoy good steady slow =
growth. The funds own 31%; WON recommends staying below 25%.=20
    The real positive for this stock is the Group RS rating, and the =
Price RS.=20
    The negative is the very weak market.=20

    Charley=20

- ------=_NextPart_001_0052_01C2445C.3D110200
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Thanks for checking on this, Gene.&nbsp; This list =
is=20
amazing.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dgenr@swbell.net href=3D"mailto:genr@swbell.net">Gene =
Ricci</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 15, 2002 =
11:25=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
UCBH</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Ann, my data source shows growth at =
18, not=20
  too shabby&nbsp;for a bank...</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Charley... I'm awaiting a definitive =
answer=20
  from IBD on institutional ownership. I've asked them what they count =
and what=20
  they don't count because of the significant differences in the =
'numbers' from=20
  different data suppliers.&nbsp;&nbsp;My second question to them is =
'why aren't=20
  banks and pension funds, etc. counted in their numbers. </FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">In the Q&amp;A below, IBD switches =
between=20
  calling it institutional ownership and mutual funds... if a bank isn't =
an=20
  institution why doesn't IBD just call it funds? </FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>
  <TABLE cellSpacing=3D0 width=3D"100%" border=3D0>
    <TBODY>
    <TR>
      <TD class=3Dtextcell>What is a level of institutional ownership =
you=20
        consider when buying a stock? If too many shares are already =
owned by=20
        institutional investors, can that hurt a stock's chances of=20
rising?</TD></TR>
    <TR>
      <TD><IMG height=3D6 alt=3D""=20
        src=3D"http://investdaily.custhelp.com/rnt/rnw/img/trnsp.gif"=20
    width=3D1></TD></TR>
    <TR>
      <TD class=3Dsubtitle>&nbsp;</TD>
      <TD class=3Dsubtitle>Answer</TD></TR>
    <TR>
      <TD class=3Dtextcell>&nbsp;</TD>
      <TD class=3Dtextcell>It is hard to tell how much institutional =
ownership=20
        is too much. Therefore, you should place less weight on this =
factor.=20
        Rather, focus on the quality of ownership. You want to see at =
least a=20
        few of the better performing mutual funds owning the stock you =
are=20
        considering buying. In some cases, however, if too many shares =
are owned=20
        by institutional investors, this could be bad. That's because it =

        represents large potential selling if anything goes wrong with =
the=20
        company or the general =
market.<BR></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    <A title=3DChazmoore@aol.com=20
    href=3D"mailto:Chazmoore@aol.com">Chazmoore@aol.com</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 15, =
2002 8:58=20
    AM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
UCBH</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT size=3D2>Ann: I =
will give you=20
    my thoughts to get you started. <BR>Fundamentally, the stock looks =
sound.=20
    You say they lost a fraud suit but for the time being the market has =
not=20
    reacted negatively. You didn't say when, but if it wasn't yesterday, =
I=20
    wouldn't put much weight on it. The market tends to respond very =
quickly to=20
    negative news. <BR>You didn't state your investment goals, but in my =
opinion=20
    this is not a growth stock. For one thing if institutions own 91% =
now, there=20
    simply isn't enough stock available to new buyers to move the price=20
    significantly. That does not mean they cannot enjoy good steady slow =
growth.=20
    The funds own 31%; WON recommends staying below 25%. <BR>The real =
positive=20
    for this stock is the Group RS rating, and the Price RS. <BR>The =
negative is=20
    the very weak market. <BR><BR>Charley</FONT>=20
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_001_0052_01C2445C.3D110200--

- ------=_NextPart_000_0051_01C2445C.3D110200
Content-Type: image/gif;
	name="trnsp.gif"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Location: http://investdaily.custhelp.com/rnt/rnw/img/trnsp.gif

R0lGODlhAQABAJH/AP///wAAAP///wAAACH/C0FET0JFOklSMS4wAt7tACH5BAEAAAIALAAAAAAB
AAEAAAICVAEAOw==

- ------=_NextPart_000_0051_01C2445C.3D110200--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Coinstar CSTR Chazmoore@aol.com
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH "Ann"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] UCBH "Edward McDonough"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.