Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle

From: "david frank" <camelot.homes@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:38:28 -0500
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH "Ann"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
Tom, i am curious why you prefer a straight or wedging handle over a
downward drifting handle. thank you for your answer. david
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:54 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle


> John, personally I prefer a wedging handle like this to a declining one
> (which WON prefers). I note it did something similar with the c&h formed
> from early Sept '01 to early Jan '02.
>
> Nice pick, with very nice earnings forecasts
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Calkins" <jcalkins@olypen.com>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 12:34 AM
> Subject: [CANSLIM] CSTR upward wedging handle
>
>
> Hay you guys!  Get a handle on this one for me.
>
> Coinstar (CSTR) turned up as a cup with handle.  Does there need to be a
> downward slant to the bottom lows in the handle to make a better handle?
I
> see that the upper daily prices are slanting downward, but the lower daily
> prices creates a bit of a wedging pattern, any thought on this?  Also I
> don't really see much of a dry up in volume in the bottom of the ups base.
>
> (JC)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Mandatory CEO/CFO certifications deadline
>
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > Not sure where the discrepancies coming from, but Briefing.com was
> tracking
> > the progress on this all day. Here is the day's final report:
> >
> >       20:19 ET   The final 6
> >      We count only 6 companies that did not appear to make the deadline
> for
> > certifying results: RKY, GMST, HUBG, BPOP, PRU, and ZION (USAI, SRP,
SON,
> > and ALK were removed from this list). We would caution against
> overreacting
> > to this list, as it is possible that certifications did arrive at the
SEC
> > but did not get filed at this time, or that the companies might have
asked
> > for a 5 day extension.
> >
> >
> > Note that they were counting only non-bankrupt companies.
> >
> > Katherine
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
> > To: "CANSLIM" <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:12 PM
> > Subject: [CANSLIM] Mandatory CEO/CFO certifications deadline
> >
> >
> > | The SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/rules/extra/ceocfo.htm makes for
> > | interesting reading tonight, for what is not there.  While there are
> about
> > | 200 companies whose fiscal year means they did not have to report by
> this
> > | evening, the website still shows (updated at 10 PM) a lot of big names
> > that
> > | were expected to report by now, and haven't.  I am not even thru the
> "A"s
> > | yet, and already see Abbot Labs and AOL, among others.
> > |
> > | A lot of energy companies still haven't reported, probably the next
> > industry
> > | sector to get racked by scandals, restatements, etc. (like it hasn't
> > | already, but could get worse).
> > |
> > | Bank of NY leads off the "B"s, followed by Bristol Myers. Caterpillar
> (in
> > | the DOW 30) and Chas Schwab headline the "C"s, along with Coca Cola
> (also
> > in
> > | the DOW). General Dynamics pops up in the "G"s, and has good company
> with
> > GM
> > | (3rd one I saw in the DOW 30, 10% ain't good) and I don't know if I
have
> > the
> > | stomach to keep reading. Knew I should have stopped, IBM pops up in
the
> > "I"s
> > | (4 for the DOW), followed by Kellogg, and Metlife. TRW and UPS finally
> > round
> > | out the list.
> > |
> > | I just hope a lot of these "blue chip", reputable companies just filed
> too
> > | late to have it show on the site, but a 10 PM update seems late enough
> to
> > | pick up anyone filing by the 5:30 deadline. Any hope the SEC got their
> > | deadlines wrong? Maybe they "just forgot"?? If the non-filers are
> punished
> > | tomorrow for not filing, it looks to be pretty bloody. Anyone trying
to
> > | understand an otherwise inexplicable drop tomorrow in a particular
stock
> > may
> > | want to check on the filing status. I found that right clicking on the
> > list
> > | allowed me to export it to Excel, where I could sort on the deadline
and
> > | next columns, and find the non filers quite easily for review.
> > |
> > | In all, 238 companies (including, of course the "no surprise" no shows
> > like
> > | Enron and Conseco and Worldcom and Qwest and US Airways) that were
> > expected
> > | to file by today still do not show on the SEC list.
> > |
> > | Tom Worley
> > | stkguru@bellsouth.net
> > | AIM: TexWorley
> > |
> > |
> > |
> > | -
> > | -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > | -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > | -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.