Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH

From: "NANCY POLCARO" <ZILLAGIRL@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 21:44:05 -0700

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

- ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C244A4.E0A796C0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can you tell me how institutions own 91% and funds own 31 %?? =20
 =20
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Chazmoore@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 6:59 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH
 =20
Ann: I will give you my thoughts to get you started. =20
Fundamentally, the stock looks sound. You say they lost a fraud suit but =
for the time being the market has not reacted negatively. You didn't say =
when, but if it wasn't yesterday, I wouldn't put much weight on it. The m=
arket tends to respond very quickly to negative news. =20
You didn't state your investment goals, but in my opinion this is not a g=
rowth stock. For one thing if institutions own 91% now, there simply isn'=
t enough stock available to new buyers to move the price significantly. T=
hat does not mean they cannot enjoy good steady slow growth. The funds ow=
n 31%; WON recommends staying below 25%. =20
The real positive for this stock is the Group RS rating, and the Price RS=
. =20
The negative is the very weak market. =20

Charley =20

- ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C244A4.E0A796C0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><BODY STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana; border:none;"><DIV>Can you tell m=
e how institutions own 91% and funds own 31 %??&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</=
DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-L=
EFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D=
"FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Original Message -----</DIV> <DIV style=3D"BACKG=
ROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt Arial; COLOR: black"><B>From:</B> Chazmoore@ao=
l.com</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August=
 15, 2002 6:59 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>To:</B> cansli=
m@lists.xmission.com</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Subject:</B=
> Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica>=
<FONT size=3D2>Ann: I will give you my thoughts to get you started. <BR>F=
undamentally, the stock looks sound. You say they lost a fraud suit but f=
or the time being the market has not reacted negatively. You didn't say w=
hen, but if it wasn't yesterday, I wouldn't put much weight on it. The ma=
rket tends to respond very quickly to negative news. <BR>You didn't state=
 your investment goals, but in my opinion this is not a growth stock. For=
 one thing if institutions own 91% now, there simply isn't enough stock a=
vailable to new buyers to move the price significantly. That does not mea=
n they cannot enjoy good steady slow growth. The funds own 31%; WON recom=
mends staying below 25%. <BR>The real positive for this stock is the Grou=
p RS rating, and the Price RS. <BR>The negative is the very weak market. =
<BR><BR>Charley</FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C244A4.E0A796C0--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.