Re: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership


From: "Ann" <annholly@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:06:26 -0400

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership "Ann"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership "Ann"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership "Ann"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C244FB.D1F26900
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0021_01C244FB.D1F26900"


- ------=_NextPart_001_0021_01C244FB.D1F26900
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for checking on that, Gene.
Ann
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Gene Ricci=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:50 PM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership


  Tom, I agree with you... unfortunately.... DGO/IBD only counts mutual =
funds ! This explains the difference between DGO and other data sources. =
DGO doesn't count them all.

  Here's what they said (today):

  "When you say "count" we count the amount of shares of the floating =
supply of stock that Mutual Funds own as registered with the NYSE and =
NASDAQ exchanges."=20

  regards,
  Gene

    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Tom Worley=20
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 5:39 PM
    Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH


    Institutional ownership includes, in addition to mutual funds, =
pension funds, insurance companies, some banks (buying for their own =
account), venture capital funds, etc.  There are also some individual =
investors that usually get counted, a certain Saudi Arabian prince comes =
to mind, who will buy $50 to $250 million worth of stock at a time, =
easily the size of a mutual fund order.

    A bank is not always an "institutional investor" (unless buying for =
its own account) as it is often used as custodian, or even agent, for =
other institutional accounts as well as many retail accounts. My =
employer is a bank, and also custodian for its securities clients. As =
such, its collective holdings of some securities would easily be large =
enough to count as "institutional" in size, yet they are not because the =
end owner is a retail client of the bank, often making his or her own =
investment decisions.

    WON does not count bank holdings for this reason, as it is difficult =
to distinguish bank holdings as "proxy owner" from own holdings, same as =
a broker dealer holding in street name for its clients.

    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Gene Ricci=20
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:25 AM
    Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH


    Ann, my data source shows growth at 18, not too shabby for a bank...

    Charley... I'm awaiting a definitive answer from IBD on =
institutional ownership. I've asked them what they count and what they =
don't count because of the significant differences in the 'numbers' from =
different data suppliers.  My second question to them is 'why aren't =
banks and pension funds, etc. counted in their numbers.=20

    In the Q&A below, IBD switches between calling it institutional =
ownership and mutual funds... if a bank isn't an institution why doesn't =
IBD just call it funds?=20


          What is a level of institutional ownership you consider when =
buying a stock? If too many shares are already owned by institutional =
investors, can that hurt a stock's chances of rising?=20
        =20
            Answer=20
            It is hard to tell how much institutional ownership is too =
much. Therefore, you should place less weight on this factor. Rather, =
focus on the quality of ownership. You want to see at least a few of the =
better performing mutual funds owning the stock you are considering =
buying. In some cases, however, if too many shares are owned by =
institutional investors, this could be bad. That's because it represents =
large potential selling if anything goes wrong with the company or the =
general market.
        =20


      ----- Original Message -----=20
      From: Chazmoore@aol.com=20
      To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
      Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:58 AM
      Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH


      Ann: I will give you my thoughts to get you started.=20
      Fundamentally, the stock looks sound. You say they lost a fraud =
suit but for the time being the market has not reacted negatively. You =
didn't say when, but if it wasn't yesterday, I wouldn't put much weight =
on it. The market tends to respond very quickly to negative news.=20
      You didn't state your investment goals, but in my opinion this is =
not a growth stock. For one thing if institutions own 91% now, there =
simply isn't enough stock available to new buyers to move the price =
significantly. That does not mean they cannot enjoy good steady slow =
growth. The funds own 31%; WON recommends staying below 25%.=20
      The real positive for this stock is the Group RS rating, and the =
Price RS.=20
      The negative is the very weak market.=20

      Charley=20

- ------=_NextPart_001_0021_01C244FB.D1F26900
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Thanks for checking on that, Gene.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Ann</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dgenr@swbell.net href=3D"mailto:genr@swbell.net">Gene =
Ricci</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 15, 2002 =
11:50=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Inst =
Ownership</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Tom, I agree with you... =
unfortunately....=20
  DGO/IBD only counts mutual funds ! This explains the difference =
between DGO=20
  and other data sources. DGO doesn't count them all.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Here's what they said =
(today):</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>"When you say "count" we count the amount of shares of the =
floating=20
  supply of stock that Mutual Funds own as registered with the NYSE and =
NASDAQ=20
  exchanges." </DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">regards,</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Gene</FONT><BR></DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    <A title=3Dstkguru@bellsouth.net =
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">Tom=20
    Worley</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 15, =
2002 5:39=20
    PM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
UCBH</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Institutional ownership includes, in =
addition to=20
    mutual funds, pension funds, insurance companies, some banks (buying =
for=20
    their own account), venture capital funds, etc.&nbsp; There are also =
some=20
    individual investors that usually get counted, a certain Saudi =
Arabian=20
    prince comes to mind, who will buy $50 to $250 million worth of =
stock at a=20
    time, easily the size of a mutual fund order.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>A bank is not always an "institutional =
investor"=20
    (unless buying for its own account) as it is often used as =
custodian, or=20
    even agent, for other institutional accounts as well as many retail=20
    accounts. My employer is a bank, and also custodian for its =
securities=20
    clients. As such, its collective holdings of some securities would =
easily be=20
    large enough to count as "institutional" in size, yet they are not =
because=20
    the end owner is a retail client of the bank, often making his or =
her own=20
    investment decisions.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>WON does not count bank holdings for this =
reason, as=20
    it is difficult to distinguish bank holdings as "proxy owner" from =
own=20
    holdings, same as a broker dealer holding in street name for its=20
    clients.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20
    <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> =
<A=20
    title=3Dgenr@swbell.net href=3D"mailto:genr@swbell.net">Gene =
Ricci</A> </DIV>
    <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:25 AM</DIV>
    <DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH</DIV></DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Ann, my data source shows growth =
at 18, not=20
    too shabby&nbsp;for a bank...</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Charley... I'm awaiting a =
definitive answer=20
    from IBD on institutional ownership. I've asked them what they count =
and=20
    what they don't count because of the significant differences in the=20
    'numbers' from different data suppliers.&nbsp;&nbsp;My second =
question to=20
    them is 'why aren't banks and pension funds, etc. counted in their =
numbers.=20
    </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">In the Q&amp;A below, IBD switches =
between=20
    calling it institutional ownership and mutual funds... if a bank =
isn't an=20
    institution why doesn't IBD just call it funds? </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>
    <TABLE cellSpacing=3D0 width=3D"100%" border=3D0>
      <TBODY>
      <TR>
        <TD class=3Dtextcell>What is a level of institutional ownership =
you=20
          consider when buying a stock? If too many shares are already =
owned by=20
          institutional investors, can that hurt a stock's chances of=20
      rising?</TD></TR>
      <TR>
        <TD><IMG height=3D6 alt=3D""=20
          src=3D"http://investdaily.custhelp.com/rnt/rnw/img/trnsp.gif"=20
      width=3D1></TD></TR>
      <TR>
        <TD class=3Dsubtitle>&nbsp;</TD>
        <TD class=3Dsubtitle>Answer</TD></TR>
      <TR>
        <TD class=3Dtextcell>&nbsp;</TD>
        <TD class=3Dtextcell>It is hard to tell how much institutional =
ownership=20
          is too much. Therefore, you should place less weight on this =
factor.=20
          Rather, focus on the quality of ownership. You want to see at =
least a=20
          few of the better performing mutual funds owning the stock you =
are=20
          considering buying. In some cases, however, if too many shares =
are=20
          owned by institutional investors, this could be bad. That's =
because it=20
          represents large potential selling if anything goes wrong with =
the=20
          company or the general =
market.<BR></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE=20
    style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
      <DIV=20
      style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
      <A title=3DChazmoore@aol.com=20
      href=3D"mailto:Chazmoore@aol.com">Chazmoore@aol.com</A> </DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
      title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
      =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
      </DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 15, =
2002 8:58=20
      AM</DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
UCBH</DIV>
      <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT size=3D2>Ann: I =
will give=20
      you my thoughts to get you started. <BR>Fundamentally, the stock =
looks=20
      sound. You say they lost a fraud suit but for the time being the =
market=20
      has not reacted negatively. You didn't say when, but if it wasn't=20
      yesterday, I wouldn't put much weight on it. The market tends to =
respond=20
      very quickly to negative news. <BR>You didn't state your =
investment goals,=20
      but in my opinion this is not a growth stock. For one thing if=20
      institutions own 91% now, there simply isn't enough stock =
available to new=20
      buyers to move the price significantly. That does not mean they =
cannot=20
      enjoy good steady slow growth. The funds own 31%; WON recommends =
staying=20
      below 25%. <BR>The real positive for this stock is the Group RS =
rating,=20
      and the Price RS. <BR>The negative is the very weak market.=20
      <BR><BR>Charley</FONT>=20
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_001_0021_01C244FB.D1F26900--

- ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C244FB.D1F26900
Content-Type: image/gif;
	name="trnsp.gif"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Location: http://investdaily.custhelp.com/rnt/rnw/img/trnsp.gif

R0lGODlhAQABAJH/AP///wAAAP///wAAACH/C0FET0JFOklSMS4wAt7tACH5BAEAAAIALAAAAAAB
AAEAAAICVAEAOw==

- ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C244FB.D1F26900--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership "Ann"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership "Ann"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Inst Ownership "Ann"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.