Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Recent activity
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 17:52:00 -0600
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Nice summary. Only an additional thought or two. Number 6 is probably not a large positive. Only medical is the sort of industry that can really be considered a market leader. The others aren't really significant industries. Retail can be something of a leader I suppose (I'm not clear on this, someone can correct me if I'm wrong, HD and WMT come to mind), but I don't see those stocks as real leaders. Your negative arguments I find more compelling, or at least am inclined to give more weight to than the positives. I have one more negative. I don't see any industry producing the 40 to 100% gains in revenues in earnings that can give you the really big winning stocks. I keep thinking back to the nineties when we had several industries producing huge growth rates for years, and that is gone and nothing has taken its place. I guess we can have some nice moves in the market without that, but also probably won't get any huge moves until some industry's step up. On 16 Aug 2002 at 11:39, Eric Jaenike wrote: > 6. Some potential leadership forming, including gaming (BYD ISLE), > medical (LNCR AMSG HSIC), education (APOL CECO COCO), HMOs (CVH SIE > MME), regional banks (if you're willing to include that group as > leadership), retail (JASA PETM MIK KSS). - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]