From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 07:25:13 -0500
Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] David Ryan "J. Lobatto"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI Jack Tencza
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI Jack Tencza
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Hi Jack, Yes, copied the definition in the help files at IBD. Click on the Stock Checkup for ANSI (or any stock) and there is a small gray rectangular "Help" button to the top right. There's a glossary of terms, etc. Same is true for DailyGraphs Online, where they have a complete Help file available from the menu selections. Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Tencza" <jtenz@yahoo.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 7:15 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI | Holy Cow! Katherine thanks. Seems like I remember | seeing this somewhere. Where did you find this in IBD | help? | | Jack | --- Katherine Malm <kmalm@earthlink.net> wrote: | > Morning Tom, | > | > Yes, they use the same methodology. I recalled we've | > discussed the 3 vs 5 yr difference between IBD and | > DGO data on the list recently, so didn't mention | > that specifically. Here's the IBD definition from | > their help files: | > | > EPS Growth Rate %, 3 YEAR | > The compound 3-year growth rate calculated using the | > least squares fit over the latest two to three | > years' earnings per share on a running 12-month | > basis. Growth rate will be calculated only if there | > is a minimum of eight trailing 4-quarter periods of | > positive earnings (uses a minimum of 11 quarters of | > data). | > | > -Katherine | > ----- Original Message ----- | > From: Tom Worley | > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com | > Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 7:01 AM | > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI | > | > | > Hi Katherine, | > | > What I don't know is if IBD is also using the | > regression method. The only thing I ever saw | > confirmed is that they use only a 3 year period, | > while DGO uses up to 5 years when available. | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > From: Katherine Malm | > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com | > Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 7:57 AM | > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI | > | > | > Hermann & Tom, | > | > No mystery, just need to know the definition, this | > one from the DailyGraph help files (highlighting is | > mine). The regression approach is the reason why a | > back of the envelope check doesn't always appear to | > match their numbers. | > | > Earnings Growth Rate % | > This item is calculated by using a least squares | > regression fit over a 3-to-5 year period of earnings | > per share based on a trailing four-quarter count. | > For example, if a stock is currently in its second | > quarter, the first period used in this calculation | > will consist of the sum of Q2 + Q1 (of the current | > fiscal year) plus Q4 +Q3 (of the prior fiscal year). | > Each successive period will be based on the next | > trailing four quarters of earnings per share. | > | > The amount of time used to calculate the Growth | > Rate is based on two factors; | > | > a.. Availability of data | > b.. Positive earnings | > If a stock does not have at least three years of | > positive earnings (based on the trailing | > four-quarter method noted above), an "N/A" will | > appear. | > | > The amount of time used for this calculation will | > consist of at least three years but no more than | > five years of positive earnings per share. If a | > four-quarter period sum is negative, that period and | > additional earnings further back in time, will not | > be used in the calculation of this data item. | > | > --Katherine | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net> | > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> | > Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 6:40 AM | > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI | > | > | > | Sorry, Hermann, I could have explained better. | > In 1998, ANSI earned 30 | > | cents. So from 1998 thru last year, earnings | > declined from 30 cents to 21 | > | cents. That's a 30% decline. Annualized would be | > less, so I can't explain | > | the -27%. You should note that IBD uses a 3 | > year cycle, while DGO (where | > | the growth rate shows as +4%) uses 5 years. | > | | > | ----- Original Message ----- | > | From: "Hermann Ertl" <hertl@attglobal.net> | > | To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> | > | Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 2:14 AM | > | Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI | > | | > | | > | > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net> | > | > Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 10:00:20 -0400 | > | > | > | > Jack, a good example of how you have to be | > careful with "calculated" long | > | > term statistics. In this case, ANSI earned (by | > DGO's adjusted | > | calculations) | > | > a total of 75 cents in 1999, then dropped to 9 | > cents in 2000 and 21 cents | > | in | > | > 2001. So 2001 looks good by comparison, but | > lousy on a 3 year basis. On | > | the | > | > other hand, the forecasts of 51 cents this | > year and 77 cents next year | > | > continue the short term trend higher at a rate | > that well exceeds market | > | > norms. | > | > | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > | > From: "Jack Tencza" <jtenz@yahoo.com> | > | > Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 9:34 AM | > | > | > | > | > | > IBD vital statistics shows ANSI's 3 yr. EPS at | > -27%. | > | > Am I correct in assuming this is a straight | > line | > | > calculation? If it was $1.00 3 yrs. ago, today | > it's | > | > .73? | > | | > | | > | | > | Tom, your data do not explain, "3 yr. EPS at | > -27%." | > | In order to calculate a three year trend (Jack | > says, "3 yrs. ago") | > | one needs data for four years - you supplied | > only data for three | > | years. | > | | > | If you supply data for four years we may can | > figure out the answer | > | to Jack's question how the three year trend is | > calculated, or do | > | you know? | > | | > | Maybe the problem lies somewhere else. Maybe | > quarterly results were | > | used. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] David Ryan "J. Lobatto"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI Jack Tencza
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] ANSI Jack Tencza
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]