From: "Edward W. Gjertsen II" <ed@macktracks.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] CVH
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 13:56:21 -0500
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CVH Gene Ricci
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CVH "david frank"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] CVH "David Taggart"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] CVH Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
We had our representative on the NYSE floor go and speak with the specialist - he hid behind "order imbalance" - floor rules. We were asked if we wanted to file a complaint - we decided no. There will be many more battles like this. What is does do is make us look at alternatives. Like I mentioned in an earlier post - Island and other ECN's would have given us a fill around 32.50. So we are exploring our execution options. Our CANSLIM philosophy is broken down into three simple parts: Analysis, Money Management and Execution. This time, the 3rd element, execution, was the weakest link. So , instead of complaining about it, we are doing what American's do best, head to the competition with a better product. Ed Gjertsen II ed@macktracks.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of david frank Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CVH I got caught in this so-called CVH inbalanced. luckily i had a limit order in place. although limit orders don't work sometimes- because they don't have to execute limit orders, although they are within the price window. of course. there were too many eyes on CVH. i was curious what kind of remedy is there for this specialist's malfeasance, especially for buyers @ 34.50 and above- more than 10 minutes after placing their market orders. david - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward W. Gjertsen II" <ed@macktracks.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:36 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] CVH > One of the risks with CANSLIM - too many investors ready to pounce on > too few stocks. We have been stalking CVH for quite a while. We put in > an order prior to it reaching its pivot (cheating) when NYSE on level > two showed $32.40 offer. As CANSLIMR's moved in to buy - the specialist > did not open the book until $34.50. The specialist claimed "order > imbalance" but my source at Pershing said he was working another book. > We were quite upset The stock moved over $2.00 on an imbalance of > 110,000 shs. The market maker was caught flatfooted. We quickly sold > out of our position because we were over the 5% threshold. > > Those trading Island or other ECN's may have been filled around > 32.40-32.50. We watch Time and Sales on all our fills and the only > prints were coming from ECN's. With CANSLIM being one of the most > popular strategies for individual investors, execution is becoming more > and more difficult. > > Ed Gjertsen II > ed@macktracks.com > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CVH Gene Ricci
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CVH "david frank"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] CVH "David Taggart"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] CVH Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]